![]() |
|
|

*
Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, Gerontology Research Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21224;
ROW Sciences, Rockville, Maryland 20850 and
**
Department of Nutritional Sciences, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901-8525
1To whom correspondence should be addressed at Laboratory of Neuroscience, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gerontology Research Center, 5600 Nathan Shock Drive, Baltimore, MD 21224. E-mail: MLANE{at}vms.grc.nia.nih.gov
Energy restriction (ER) extends the life span and slows aging and
age-related diseases in short-lived mammalian species. Although
a wide variety of physiological systems have been studied using this
paradigm, little is known regarding the effects of ER on skeletal
health and reproductive aging. Studies in rhesus monkeys have reported
that ER delays sexual and skeletal maturation in young male monkeys and
reduces bone mass in adult males. No studies have examined the chronic
effects on bone health and reproductive aging in female rhesus monkeys.
The present cross-sectional study examined the effects of chronic
(6 y) ER on skeletal and reproductive indices in 40 premenopausal and
perimenopausal (727 y old) female rhesus macaques (Macaca
mulatta). Although ER monkeys weighed less and had lower fat
mass, ER did not alter bone mineral density, bone mineral content,
osteocalcin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, 1,25-hydroxyvitamin D or parathyroid
hormone concentrations, menstrual cycling or reproductive hormone
concentrations. Body weight and lean mass were significantly related to
bone mineral density and bone mineral content at all skeletal sites
(total body, lumbar spine, mid and distal radius; P
0.04). The number of total menstrual cycles over 2 y, as
well as the percentage of normal-length cycles (2431 d), was
lower in older than in younger monkeys (P
0.05).
Older monkeys also had lower estradiol (P = 0.02)
and higher follicle-stimulating hormone (P = 0.02) concentrations than did younger monkeys. We conclude that ER does
not negatively affect these indices of skeletal or reproductive health
and does not alter age-associated changes in the same variables.
KEY WORDS: aging bone loss primate reproduction energy restriction
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A B Loucks Refutation of "the myth of the female athlete triad" Br. J. Sports Med., January 1, 2007; 41(1): 55 - 57. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Lujan, A. A. Krzemien, R. L. Reid, and D. A. Van Vugt Developing a Model of Nutritional Amenorrhea in Rhesus Monkeys Endocrinology, January 1, 2006; 147(1): 483 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K Heilbronn and E. Ravussin Calorie restriction and aging: review of the literature and implications for studies in humans Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2003; 78(3): 361 - 369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. B. Loucks and J. R. Thuma Luteinizing Hormone Pulsatility Is Disrupted at a Threshold of Energy Availability in Regularly Menstruating Women J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., January 1, 2003; 88(1): 297 - 311. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Walford, D. Mock, R. Verdery, and T. MacCallum Calorie Restriction in Biosphere 2: Alterations in Physiologic, Hematologic, Hormonal, and Biochemical Parameters in Humans Restricted for a 2-Year Period J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2002; 57(6): B211 - 224. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||