![]() |
|
|
Department of Neuroscience and Anatomy, G.M. Leader Family Laboratory for Alzheimers Disease Research, Penn State University College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, and Nutrition Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16814 *
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: jrc3{at}psu.edu
ABSTRACT
Iron regulatory proteins (IRPs) are proteins involved in the regulation of intracellular iron homeostasis that bind to specific mRNA structures termed iron responsive elements (IREs). Because the target mRNAs for the IRPs are both cytosolic and membrane associated, we hypothesize that movement of IRPs between the cytosolic and the membrane associated subcellular fractions occurs in response to intracellular iron changes. We tested this hypothesis in a cell culture model, using mouse fibroblast cells (NIH 3T3) and macrophage cells (J774), and in a rat model of early iron deficiency and excess. This presented the first opportunity to examine IRP binding activity in rat brain during states of dietary iron deficiency and excess. Binding activity for IRPs was demonstrated in both membrane and cytosolic fractions in the cell lines and the rat brain homogenates. Although IRP binding activity is predominantly located in the cytosol (90%), there was increased IRP/IRE binding activity in both cytosolic and membrane fractions when the cells were treated with deferoxamine, and decreased binding activity after treatment with iron. In the rat study, brain cortex, hippocampus and striatum homogenates had more IRP binding activity in iron-deficient rats and less in iron-supplemented rats in a region- and time-specific manner. The intracellular distribution of IRPs also changed between the cytosolic and membrane fractions of the brain homogenates in conjunction with changes in iron. These in vivo studies are consistent with the cell culture analyses showing intracellular redistribution of IRPs as a function of iron status. The results of these experiments extend our understanding of cytoplasmic mRNA binding protein activity and raise questions regarding the mechanism by which mRNA binding proteins can locate their target mRNAs within cells. The elucidation of this mechanism will have a significant impact on our understanding of eukaryotic gene regulation.
KEY WORDS: iron regulation post-transcriptional regulation rats iron regulatory proteins iron deficiency cell culture
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. C. Sammarco, S. Ditch, A. Banerjee, and E. Grabczyk Ferritin L and H Subunits Are Differentially Regulated on a Post-transcriptional Level J. Biol. Chem., February 22, 2008; 283(8): 4578 - 4587. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Golub, C. E. Hogrefe, and S. L. Germann Iron Deprivation during Fetal Development Changes the Behavior of Juvenile Rhesus Monkeys J. Nutr., April 1, 2007; 137(4): 979 - 984. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Patton, D. J. Pinero, N. Surguladze, J. Beard, and J. R. Connor Subcellular localization of iron regulatory proteins to Golgi and ER membranes J. Cell Sci., October 1, 2005; 118(19): 4365 - 4373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. D. Knutson, M. R. Vafa, D. J. Haile, and M. Wessling-Resnick Iron loading and erythrophagocytosis increase ferroportin 1 (FPN1) expression in J774 macrophages Blood, December 1, 2003; 102(12): 4191 - 4197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||