Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feillet-Coudray, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rayssiguier, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feillet-Coudray, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rayssiguier, Y.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:2306-2311.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

Exchangeable Magnesium Pool Masses Reflect the Magnesium Status of Rats

Christine Feillet-Coudray1, Charles Coudray, Fabienne Brûlé, Elyett Gueux, Andrzej Mazur, Steven A. Abrams* and Yves Rayssiguier

Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’Auvergne, Unité Maladies Métaboliques et Micronutriments, INRA, Theix, 63122 St Genès Champanelle, France and * U.S. Department of Agriculture/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030

1To whom correspondence should be addressed.

A sensitive and valid marker to assess magnesium (Mg) status in humans is not available. The kinetically determined exchangeable pool masses have been used for other minerals, such as zinc and selenium, as markers of whole-body mineral status. To evaluate the validity of this relationship for Mg, we measured the exchangeable pools of Mg in rats over a range of magnesium dietary intakes. Rats weighing ~170 g were fed a control diet (500 mg Mg/kg), a marginally Mg-deficient diet (200 mg/kg) or a severely Mg-deficient diet (60 mg Mg/kg) for 2 wk. Subsequently, rats were administered an intravenous injection of 25Mg, and the plasma 25Mg disappearance curve was followed for the next 7 d. The following two methods were employed to analyze the exchangeable pools of Mg: 1) formal compartmental modeling and 2) a simplified determination of the total mass of the rapidly exchangeable Mg pool (EMgP). The mass of the three exchangeable pools (two extracellular pools and one intracellular pool) determined by compartmental analysis decreased in proportion to dietary Mg intake. EMgP, the combined pools of Mg that exchange with the plasma Mg within 48 h, decreased significantly as dietary Mg was lowered. It was positively correlated with conventional markers of Mg status (total Mg in plasma, erythrocyte and tibia Mg levels). Compartmental analysis assesses Mg exchangeable pools more accurately, but determination of EMgP is simpler and faster. Our findings demonstrate that the exchangeable pools of Mg constitute a good marker of Mg status in rats.


KEY WORDS: • magnesium • exchangeable pool • status • rats




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. Feillet-Coudray, C. Coudray, E. Gueux, A. Mazur, and Y. Rayssiguier
A New In Vitro Blood Load Test Using a Magnesium Stable Isotope for Assessment of Magnesium Status
J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1220 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. Coudray, C. Feillet-Coudray, D. Grizard, J. C. Tressol, E. Gueux, and Y. Rayssiguier
Fractional Intestinal Absorption of Magnesium Is Directly Proportional to Dietary Magnesium Intake in Rats
J. Nutr., July 1, 2002; 132(7): 2043 - 2047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Feillet-Coudray, C. Coudray, J.-C. Tressol, D. Pepin, A. Mazur, S. A Abrams, and Y. Rayssiguier
Exchangeable magnesium pool masses in healthy women: effects of magnesium supplementation
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2002; 75(1): 72 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]