Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Granfeldt, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Björck, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Granfeldt, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Björck, I.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:2207-2214.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

An Examination of the Possibility of Lowering the Glycemic Index of Oat and Barley Flakes by Minimal Processing

Yvonne Granfeldt1, Ann-Charlott Eliasson* and Inger Björck

Departments of Applied Nutrition and Food Chemistry, and * Food Engineering, Chemical Centre, University of Lund, S-221 00 Lund, Sweden

1To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Differences in glycemic responses to various starchy foods are related to differences in the rate of starch digestion and absorption. In this study, the importance of the degree of gelatinization and the product thickness for postprandial glycemic and insulinemic responses to rolled oats and barley were studied in healthy subjects (5 men and 5 women). Thick (1.0 mm) rolled oats were made from raw or preheated (roasted or steamed) kernels. In addition, thin (0.5 mm) rolled oats were made from roasted or roasted and steamed (processed under conditions simulating commercial production) oat kernels. Finally, steamed rolled barley kernels (0.5 or 1.0 mm) were prepared. All thin flakes elicited high glucose and insulin responses [glycemic index (GI), 88–118; insulinemic index (II), 84–102], not significantly different from white wheat bread (P > 0.05). In contrast, all varieties of thick oat flakes gave significantly lower metabolic responses (GI, 70–78; II, 58–77) than the reference bread (P < 0.05). Thick barley flakes, however, gave high glucose and insulin responses (GI, 94; II, 84), probably because the botanical structure underwent more destruction than the corresponding oat flakes. We conclude that minimal processing of oat and barley flakes had a relatively minor effect on GI features compared with the more extensive commercial processing. One exception was thick oat flakes, which in contrast to the corresponding barley flakes, had a low GI.


KEY WORDS: • glycemic index • oats • barley • humans




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet Rec.Home page
I. Vervuert, K. Voigt, T. Hollands, D. Cuddeford, and M. Coenen
Effects of processing barley on its digestion by horses
Vet Rec., May 24, 2008; 162(21): 684 - 688.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
K. M. Behall, D. J. Scholfield, and J. Hallfrisch
Comparison of Hormone and Glucose Responses of Overweight Women to Barley and Oats
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., June 1, 2005; 24(3): 182 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
K. Foster-Powell, S. H. Holt, and J. C Brand-Miller
International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2002; 76(1): 5 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]