Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Klassen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fürst, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Klassen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Fürst, P.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:177-182.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

The Pharmacokinetic Responses of Humans to 20 g of Alanyl-Glutamine Dipeptide Differ with the Dosing Protocol but Not with Gastric Acidity or in Patients with Acute Dengue Fever

Petra Klassen1, Manolo Mazariegos*, Noel W. Solomons* and Peter Fürst

Institute for Biological Chemistry and Nutrition, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany and the * Center for Studies of Sensory Impairment, Aging and Metabolism (CeSSIAM), Guatemala City, Guatemala

1To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Pharmacokinetic responses to oral doses of the dipeptide, L-alanyl-glutamine (Ala-Gln), were evaluated after a single, bolus load or an intermittent dosing in normal healthy subjects (n = 8) to find the optimal mode of oral administration. In a subgroup (n = 4) of the healthy subjects, the influence of a gastric acid suppressor (Omeprazole) was investigated. The influence of an acute episode of classic Dengue fever was examined in eight patients. All modes of administration to healthy subjects significantly increased free plasma Gln and alanine concentrations. Peak increments of plasma Gln concentration were 794 ± 107 µmol/L (mean ± SEM) after bolus intake of 20 g of Ala-Gln and 398 ± 61 µmol/L after intermittent intake of the same cumulative dosage of the dipeptide (P < 0.01). After intermittent dosing, the maximum peak increase appeared significantly later (P < 0.01). Areas under the curve (AUC), expressing the integrated responses over time of plasma free Gln and alanine concentrations, did not differ after bolus and intermittent loads of Ala-Gln. Pretreatment with the acid suppressor, Omeprazole, did not influence Gln (P = 0.79) or alanine (P = 0.90) plasma increment. Dengue patients manifested the same pharmacokinetic responses to a 20 g Ala-Gln bolus as healthy controls. In general, on a micromolar concentration basis, Gln and alanine followed parallel tracks in terms of plasma appearance, clearance and elimination after the oral administration of 20 g of the Ala-Gln dipeptide through the range of conditions and dosing protocols explored here.


KEY WORDS: • glutamine • alanine • humans • pharmacokinetics • oral administration







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2000 by American Society for Nutrition