![]() |
|
|
Department of Nutritional Science, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: djc{at}discovernet.net
Test weighing is the "gold standard" for documenting lactogenesis
stage II. However, this method is impractical for use in population
studies. Maternal perception of the timing of the onset of lactation
may be a useful proxy for lactogenesis stage II. This study seeks to
validate maternal perception of the onset of lactation as a marker of
lactogenesis stage II. Women (n = 60) were
recruited after cesarean delivery. Beginning at 24 h postpartum
(pp), the onset of lactation was assessed 3 times daily by both test
weighing and maternal perception. Delayed onset of lactation was
defined as follows: 1) milk transfer < 9.2
g/feeding at 60 h pp and 2) maternal perception
72 h pp. Misclassification analyses were conducted.
Multivariate logistic regression, bivariate analyses and Cox survival
analyses were used to evaluate the determinants and consequences of
delayed onset of lactation, using both definitions. The sensitivity and
specificity of delayed maternal perception as an indicator of delayed
lactogenesis were 71.4 and 79.3%, respectively. Four risk factors for
low milk transfer were significant (P < 0.05) or
nearly significant (P
0.08) predictors of
delayed perception of the onset of lactation. The effects of low milk
transfer and delayed maternal perception on breast-feeding duration
were similarly modified by intended breast-feeding duration. The
magnitude and directionality of the ß coefficients for the milk
transfer and perception variables were consistent. On the basis of
these results, we conclude that maternal perception of the onset of
lactation is a valid public health indicator of lactogenesis stage
II.
KEY WORDS: breast-feeding lactogenesis stage II test weighing cesarean delivery lactation
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Kimura and M. Matsuoka Changes in Breast Skin Temperature During the Course of Breastfeeding J Hum Lact, February 1, 2007; 23(1): 60 - 69. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.A. Mitchell, P.S. Blair, and M.P. L'Hoir Should Pacifiers Be Recommended to Prevent Sudden Infant Death Syndrome? Pediatrics, May 1, 2006; 117(5): 1755 - 1758. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. G. Dewey, L. A. Nommsen-Rivers, M. J. Heinig, and R. J. Cohen Risk Factors for Suboptimal Infant Breastfeeding Behavior, Delayed Onset of Lactation, and Excess Neonatal Weight Loss Pediatrics, September 1, 2003; 112(3): 607 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Hruschka, D. W. Sellen, A. D. Stein, and R. Martorell Delayed Onset of Lactation and Risk of Ending Full Breast-Feeding Early in Rural Guatemala J. Nutr., August 1, 2003; 133(8): 2592 - 2599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Slusher, R. Hampton, F. Bode-Thomas, S. Pam, F. Akor, and P. Meier Promoting the Exclusive Feeding of Own Mother's Milk through the Use of Hindmilk and Increased Maternal Milk Volume for Hospitalized, Low Birth Weight Infants (< 1800 grams) in Nigeria: A Feasibility Study J Hum Lact, May 1, 2003; 19(2): 191 - 198. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Grajeda and R. Perez-Escamilla Stress During Labor and Delivery Is Associated with Delayed Onset of Lactation among Urban Guatemalan Women J. Nutr., October 1, 2002; 132(10): 3055 - 3060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. M. Rasmussen, J. A. Hilson, and C. L. Kjolhede Obesity May Impair Lactogenesis II J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 3009S - 3011. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Perez-Escamilla and D. J. Chapman Validity and Public Health Implications of Maternal Perception of the Onset of Lactation: An International Analytical Overview J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 3021S - 3024. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||