![]() |
|
|
Health Services Academy, West Blue Area, Islamabad, Pakistan.
2To whom correspondence should be addressed: Center for Population Studies, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 49-51 Bedford Square, London WCIB 3DP.
In the context of limited effectiveness of iron supplementation programs, intermittent iron supplementation is currently under debate as a possible alternative strategy that may enhance the effectiveness of operational programs. This field-based trial assessed the outcome of twice weekly iron supplementation compared to daily in Pakistan. A double-blind, randomized, clinical trial was conducted in Northern Pakistan. Anemic pregnant women (n = 191) were assigned to receive daily (200 mg ferrous sulfate) or twice weekly (2 x 200 mg ferrous sulfate) iron supplementation. Hemoglobin was measured at baseline and at 4-wk intervals for up to 12 wk. Serum ferritin was measured at baseline and 8 or 12 wk. Analysis was by intention to treat. The two groups did not differ in age, parity, sociodemographic characteristics, hemoglobin or serum ferritin concentrations at baseline. Women who received iron daily had a greater rise in hemoglobin compared with women who received iron twice weekly (17.8 ± 1.8 vs. 3.8 ± 1.2 g/L, P < 0.001). The serum ferritin concentrations increased by 17.7 ± 3.9 µg/L (P < 0.001) in the daily supplemented group and did not change in the twice weekly group. Daily iron supplementation remained superior to twice weekly supplementation after controlling initial hemoglobin Z-scores and duration of treatment. The body mass index (BMI) modified the effect of daily versus twice weekly iron supplementation. For every unit increase in BMI, the difference between the two treatment groups was reduced by 0.0014 (final hemoglobin Z-score; P = 0.027). We recommend continuation of daily iron supplementation as opposed to intermittent iron supplementation in pregnant women in developing countries.
KEY WORDS: anemia iron supplementation pregnant women intervention trial Pakistan
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Jasti, A. M. Siega-Riz, M. E. Cogswell, A. G. Hartzema, and M. E. Bentley Pill Count Adherence to Prenatal Multivitamin/Mineral Supplement Use among Low-Income Women J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1093 - 1101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. Desai, R. Dhar, D. H. Rosen, S. K. Kariuki, Y. P. Shi, P. A. Kager, and F. O. ter Kuile Daily Iron Supplementation Is More Efficacious than Twice Weekly Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Childhood Anemia in Western Kenya J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1167 - 1174. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Villar, M. Merialdi, A. M. Gulmezoglu, E. Abalos, G. Carroli, R. Kulier, and M. de Onis Nutritional Interventions during Pregnancy for the Prevention or Treatment of Maternal Morbidity and Preterm Delivery: An Overview of Randomized Controlled Trials J. Nutr., May 1, 2003; 133(5): 1606S - 1625. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-C. Ekstrom, S. Z. Hyder, A M. R Chowdhury, S. A Chowdhury, B. Lonnerdal, J.-P. Habicht, and L. A. Persson Efficacy and trial effectiveness of weekly and daily iron supplementation among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh: disentangling the issues Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1392 - 1400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||