![]() |
|
|
Department of Biochemistry, Emory University School of Medicine
The response of a cell to its external environment requires rapid and significant alteration of protein amount, localization and/or function. This regulation involves a complex combination of processes that control synthesis, localization and degradation. All of these processes must be properly regulated and are often interrelated. Intracellular proteolysis is largely accomplished by the ubiquitin-dependent system and has been shown to be required for growth control, cell cycle regulation, receptor function, development and the stress response. Substrates subject to regulated degradation by this system include cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, tumor suppressors, transcription factors and cell surface receptors. In addition, proteins that are damaged by oxidation or that are improperly folded or localized are substrates whose degradation by this system often leads to antigen presentation on the surface of the cell in the context of Class I major histocompatibility complex molecules. A very large body of work in the last fifteen years has shown that degradation by this system requires the covalent attachment of a small protein called ubiquitin and that this modification serves to direct target proteins for degradation by a 26S proteolytic particle, the proteasome. Thus, the attachment of the ubiquitin domain is of vital importance in regulating normal growth and differentiation, as well as in defending against cellular damage caused by xenobiotics, environmental insults, infection and mutation. This review focuses on the role of ubiquitination in the cellular signaling pathways that deal with these external influences.
KEY WORDS: ubiquitin proteasome receptor stress-response apoptosis
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Xu, C. Sztalryd, X. Lu, J. T. Tansey, J. Gan, H. Dorward, A. R. Kimmel, and C. Londos Post-translational Regulation of Adipose Differentiation-related Protein by the Ubiquitin/Proteasome Pathway J. Biol. Chem., December 30, 2005; 280(52): 42841 - 42847. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. St-Arnaud Ubiquitin Ligase: What Is Your True Substrate? IBMS BoneKEy, July 1, 2005; 2(7): 6 - 10. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Reid Response of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway to changes in muscle activity Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, June 1, 2005; 288(6): R1423 - R1431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Misaghi, P. J. Galardy, W. J. N. Meester, H. Ovaa, H. L. Ploegh, and R. Gaudet Structure of the Ubiquitin Hydrolase UCH-L3 Complexed with a Suicide Substrate J. Biol. Chem., January 14, 2005; 280(2): 1512 - 1520. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Session 7: Ubiquitin & Proteasomes Toxicol Pathol, October 1, 2004; 32(6): 740 - 742. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Beck Jr. and N. Knecht Osteopontin Regulation by Inorganic Phosphate Is ERK1/2-, Protein Kinase C-, and Proteasome-dependent J. Biol. Chem., October 24, 2003; 278(43): 41921 - 41929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Gan-Erdene, K. Nagamalleswari, L. Yin, K. Wu, Z.-Q. Pan, and K. D. Wilkinson Identification and Characterization of DEN1, a Deneddylase of the ULP Family J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 28892 - 28900. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Kachroo, M. E. Nasrallah, and J. B. Nasrallah Self-Incompatibility in the Brassicaceae: Receptor-Ligand Signaling and Cell-to-Cell Communication PLANT CELL, May 1, 2002; 14(90001): S227 - 238. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Stramer, J. R. Cook, M. E. Fini, A. Taylor, and M. Obin Induction of the Ubiquitin-Proteasome Pathway during the Keratocyte Transition to the Repair Fibroblast Phenotype Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2001; 42(8): 1698 - 1706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Yan, J. H. Doelling, T. G. Falbel, A. M. Durski, and R. D. Vierstra The Ubiquitin-Specific Protease Family from Arabidopsis. AtUBP1 and 2 Are Required for the Resistance to the Amino Acid Analog Canavanine Plant Physiology, December 1, 2000; 124(4): 1828 - 1843. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Tatham, E. Jaffray, O. A. Vaughan, J. M. P. Desterro, C. H. Botting, J. H. Naismith, and R. T. Hay Polymeric Chains of SUMO-2 and SUMO-3 Are Conjugated to Protein Substrates by SAE1/SAE2 and Ubc9 J. Biol. Chem., September 14, 2001; 276(38): 35368 - 35374. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||