Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by de Castro, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by de Castro, J. M.

Prior Day's Intake Has Macronutrient-Specific Delayed Negative Feedback Effects on the Spontaneous Food Intake of Free-Living Humans

Manuscript received 17 September 1996. Initial reviews completed 10 December 1996. Revision accepted 9 September 1997.

John M. de Castro

Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neuroscience Program, Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta GA 30303-3083

A fundamental issue in understanding how energy balance is accomplished involves comprehending how changes in intake affect subsequent intake. This was investigated in free-living humans by reanalyzing the data previously collected from 733 adults who were paid to maintain a 7-d diary of everything they ate and when they ate it. Food energy intake during a day was found to only mildly affect intake on the subsequent day (mean r = -0.07, P < 0.001), but was more strongly negatively related to intake occurring on the second (mean r = -0.18, P < 0.001) and third day (mean r = -0.10, P < 0.001) afterward. Each macronutrient was shown to have a maximal negative relationship with subsequent intake of that same macronutrient, with 2-d lag mean autocorrelations equal to -0.11, P < 0.001 for carbohydrate, equal to -0.18, P < 0.001 for fat, and equal to -0.13, P < 0.001 for protein. These effects on daily intake were found to result from separate negative feedback effects on meal size and frequency. The results suggest that intake affects subsequent intake by persistently setting a long-term bias that, integrated over time, produces a net shift in intake.

Key words: humans, autocorrelation, eating, macronutrients, intake regulation.

The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 128 No. 1 January 1998, pp. 61-67
Copyright ©1998 by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. M. de Castro
Varying Levels of Food Energy Self-Reporting Are Associated with Between-Group, but Not Within-Subject, Differences in Food Intake
J. Nutr., May 1, 2006; 136(5): 1382 - 1388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. M. de Castro
Dietary Energy Density Is Associated with Increased Intake in Free-Living Humans
J. Nutr., February 1, 2004; 134(2): 335 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.Home page
J. M. de Castro
Age-Related Changes in the Social, Psychological, and Temporal Influences on Food Intake in Free-Living, Healthy, Adult Humans
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., June 1, 2002; 57(6): M368 - 377.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]