Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Combes, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bonneau, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Combes, S.
Right arrow Articles by Bonneau, M.

The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 127 No. 10 October 1997, pp. 1944-1949
Copyright ©1997 by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences

Moderate Food Restriction Affects Skeletal Muscle and Liver Growth Hormone Receptors Differently in Pigs

Sylvie Combes, Isabelle Louveau, and Michel Bonneau

Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Station de Recherches Porcines, 35590 Saint Gilles, France

The present study was conducted to determine the influence of food restriction on growth hormone receptor (GHR) in porcine skeletal muscle (longissimus dorsi and trapezius) and liver in relationship to plasma growth hormone binding protein (GHBP). At 76 d of age, pigs were allotted to one of three groups. In Group R100kg-196d, pigs were fed 70% of control food intake and slaughtered at 100 kg. Control pigs had free access to food and were slaughtered either at the same weight (Group C100kg-161d) or at the same age (Group C130kg-196d) as R100kg-196d pigs. Plasma insulin-like growth factor-I concentrations tended to be lower in food-restricted pigs than in control pigs at 40 kg (P < 0.1) and 70 kg (P < 0.05). At slaughter, there were no significant differences among the three groups. In liver, 125I-labeled bovine GH specific binding was higher (P < 0.05) in food-restricted pigs than in control pigs, and GHR mRNA level was higher (P < 0.05) in food-restricted pigs than in C100kg-161d pigs. In trapezius, 125I-labeled bovine GH specific binding was lower (P < 0.05) in food-restricted pigs than in C130kg-196d pigs, and the level of GHR mRNA was higher (P < 0.01) in food-restricted pigs than in control pigs. The levels of GHR in longissimus dorsi were not affected by food restriction. The level of plasma GHBP was lower (P < 0.05) in food-restricted pigs than in C130kg-196d pigs. These data indicate that nutritional status regulates GHR in a tissue-specific manner and that there is no simple relationship between plasma GHBP and hepatic GHR in pigs.

Key words: growth, growth hormone receptor, food restriction, muscle, pigs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
L. Lefaucheur, P. Ecolan, L. Plantard, and N. Gueguen
New Insights into Muscle Fiber Types in the Pig
J. Histochem. Cytochem., May 1, 2002; 50(5): 719 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Katsumata, D. Cattaneo, P. White, K. A. Burton, and M. J. Dauncey
Growth Hormone Receptor Gene Expression in Porcine Skeletal and Cardiac Muscles Is Selectively Regulated by Postnatal Undernutrition
J. Nutr., October 1, 2000; 130(10): 2482 - 2488.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1997 by American Society for Nutrition