Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Huang, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Craig-Schmidt, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Huang, M.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Craig-Schmidt, M. C.

Arachidonate and Docosahexaenoate Added to Infant Formula Influence Fatty Acid Composition and Subsequent Eicosanoid Production in Neonatal Pigs1,2,3,

Meng-Chuan Huang and Margaret C. Craig-Schmidt4

Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849

As natural components of human milk, arachidonic and docosahexaenoic acids play important roles in neonatal development; thus, addition of these fatty acids to infant formula has been suggested. This study examined the effects of supplementation of infant formula with microbial sources of either arachidonate or docosahexaenoate or both on accretion of these fatty acids in phospholipids and subsequent modulation of eicosanoid production in neonatal pig lung. One-day-old piglets received for 25 d one of four diets (n = 5): 1) standard diet containing a fat blend similar to that of conventional infant formula, 2) diet containing 0.9 g/100 g of total fatty acids as archidonate, 3) diet containing 0.7 g/100 g as docosahexaenoate, or 4) a diet containing both 1.0 g/100 g as arachidonate and 0.8 g/100 g as docosahexaenoate. Arachidonate supplementation resulted in 30–60% significantly greater arachidonate in lung phosphatidylethanolamine and phosphatidylcholine. In phosphatidylinositol, however, arachidonate was resistant to dietary manipulation. Accretion of docosahexaenoate in all three phospholipid classes was 2.6- to 4.7-fold greater in docosahexaenoate-supplemented groups than in the standard group. Inclusion of arachidonate in the diet augmented both prostacyclin and thromboxane production by 25 to 35%. Docosahexaenoate supplementation resulted in the least eicosanoid production among the treatments, and significant suppression was observed for thromboxane when supplementation with both fatty acids was compared with supplementation with arachidonate alone. Thus, dietary arachidonic acid and docosahexaenoic acid at concentrations only slightly greater than those found in human milk tended to exercise opposing effects on lung eicosanoid production.


KEY WORDS: • arachidonic acid • docosahexaenoic acid • eicosanoid • infant formula • piglets

1 Presented in part in abstract form at Experimental Biology 94, 1994, Anaheim, CA [Huang, M. C. & Craig-Schmidt, M. C. (1994) Prostacyclin production by lung of neonatal pigs fed formula supplemented with very long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. FASEB J. 8: A425 (abs. 2458)]; the 84th Annual Meeting of American Oil Chemists' Society, 1995, San Antonio, TX [Craig-Schmidt, M. C. & Huang, M. C. (1995) Thromboxane production by lung of neonatal pigs fed formula supplemented with very long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids. Inform 6:463 (abs. 6A)]; and the International Symposium on Swine in Biomedical Research, 1995, College Park, MD [Craig-Schmidt, M. C. & Huang, M. C. (1995) Lung eicosanoid production in neonatal pigs fed formula supplemented with n-3 and n-6 fatty acids. Abstracts p. 27 (abs.)]

2 Supported in part by Wyeth-Ayerst Research and Alabama Agricultural Experimental Station (AAES journal no. 10-955079).

3 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

4 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Manuscript received 21 December 1995. Revision accepted 22 May 1996.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Nutrition