Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 126 No. 2 February 1996, pp. 410-415
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brand Miller, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiseman, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brand Miller, J. C.

Amylopectin Starch Induces Nonreversible Insulin Resistance in Rats1

C. Elke Wiseman2, Janine A. Higgins, Gareth S. Denyer and Janette C. Brand Miller3

Human Nutrition Unit and Department of Biochemistry University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales 2006 Australia

Starches that are high in amylopectin are digested and absorbed more quickly than starches with a high amylose content and produce insulin resistance in rats during long-term feeding. The aim of this study was to determine whether amylopectin-induced insulin resistance could be prevented or reversed by a period of high amylose feeding. We employed a randomized design in which two groups of rats were fed either the high amylose and then the high amylopectin diet for two consecutive 8-wk periods or vice versa (high amylopectin and then high amylose). Four other groups were fed either a high amylose or a high amylopectin diet for 8 or 16 wk. All rats were fed two 10-g meals per day (300 kJ/d), and insulin sensitivity was assessed by intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) after 8 or 16 wk of feeding. We found no difference in glucose tolerance between any group at any time point. Insulin responses, however, were 50% higher (P < 0.01) after 16 wk of high amylopectin feeding [area under the plasma insulin curve (AUC) = 18.1 ± 1.4 nmol·L-1·15 min] compared with high amylose feeding (AUC = 13.0 ± 1.2 nmol·L-1·15 min). The two groups which received both diets developed a similar degree of insulin resistance, equivalent to that after 16 wk of high amylopectin feeding. The findings suggest that amylopectin-induced insulin resistance cannot be reversed or prevented by either a subsequent or previous period of amylose feeding. Taken together, the data suggest that the nature of starch in the Western diet influences the development of noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in humans.


KEY WORDS: • starch • amylose • glycemic index • insulin resistance • rats

1 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

2 This work was conducted as partial fulfillment for the degree of B.Med.Sc. (Hons).

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Manuscript received 25 July 1995. Revision accepted 30 October 1995.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]