Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wasnich, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Davis, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Wasnich, R. D.

Anthropometric, Lifestyle and Menstrual Factors Influencing Size-Adjusted Bone Mineral Content in a Multiethnic Population of Premenopausal Women1,2,

James W. Davis3, Rachel Novotny*, Philip D. Ross and Richard D. Wasnich

Hawaii Osteoporosis Center, Honolulu, Hawaii 96814 * Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822

We report associations of anthropometric, lifestyle and menstrual characteristics with peak bone mass in a multiethnic population of premenopausal women, ages 25–34 y. Four bone sites were examined: the spine, calcaneus, and distal and proximal radius. Body mass index (BMI) was positively associated with bone mass at the spine and calcaneus, the two most trabecular sites. The calcaneus, in addition, was positively associated with an index of calf muscle mass. The distal radius was associated with an arm muscle index, grip strength and the intensity of menstrual flow (light, moderate or heavy). Menstrual flow was also associated with spine bone mass in models not adjusted for BMI; light flow was an indicator of low distal radius or spine bone mass. We hypothesize that light flow may indicate a lack of regular ovulation. The cortical proximal radius was positively associated with milk consumption and height. The magnitude of associations varied by exposure and bone site. Among the strongest associations were BMI at the spine and calcaneus (4 and 7% differences in bone mass per standard deviation), and menstrual flow at the distal radius (a 7% difference between light and heavy menstrual flow). Ethnicity was not statistically significant in multivariable models at any of the four bone sites. However, the prevalence of exposures associated with bone mass varied substantially among the ethnic groups. Ethnic differences in bone mass may have derived indirectly through differences in exposure histories. Other influences of skeletal development may also occur indirectly. Sports activity during adolescence, for instance, was not an independent predictor of bone mass, but sports activity was associated with both strength and muscle mass. Our results suggest that many factors influence peak bone mass, and that the factors vary in importance by skeletal region, possibly related to bone composition and the local intensity of exposure.


KEY WORDS: • humans • bone density • premenopause • nutrition • ethnicity

1 Supported by a grant from the R.E. Black Memorial Trust of the Hawaii Community Foundation, and by the Hawaii Osteoporosis Foundation.

2 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Manuscript received 28 December 1995. Revision accepted 9 August 1996.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
G. Mehta, P. Taylor, G. Petley, E. Dennison, C. Cooper, and K. Walker-Bone
Bone mineral status in immigrant Indo-Asian women
QJM, February 1, 2004; 97(2): 95 - 99.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Nutrition