Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Y.-K.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fan, Y.-K.
Right arrow Articles by McBride, B. W.

Selection for Growth Does Not Affect Apparent Energetic Efficiency of Jejunal Glucose Uptake in Mice1,2,

Yang-Kwang Fan3, Warren J. Croom, Jr.4,5,, Eugene J. Eisen, Linda R. Daniel, Betty L. Black* and Brian W. McBride{dagger}

Department of Animal Science * Department of Zoology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695 {dagger} Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G2W1, Canada

Five-wk-old male mice from high growth (M16) and randomly bred control (ICR) lines, plus their reciprocal crosses, ICR x M16 and M16 x ICR, were used to investigate whether whole-body O2 consumption, jejunal respiration, jejunal glucose absorption and the apparent energetic efficiency of jejunal active glucose uptake in mice are altered by genetic selection for growth as well as by heterosis and maternal effects. Whole-body O2 consumption was measured in 12 mice from each line or cross. The mice were later killed for measurement of jejunal O2, using tissue respiration chambers and jejunal glucose transport determined by 3H-3-O-methylglucose accumulation. No heterosis or maternal effects were detected in jejunal glucose active transport and active glucose uptake. Selection for growth (M16 vs. ICR) increased daily gain (1.54 vs. 1.09 g, P < 0.001), small intestinal length and weight, but did not enhance jejunal glucose transport. The apparent energetic efficiency of jejunal active glucose uptake among lines was not different (54.0, 50.4, 51.6 and 47.1 nmol ATP expended/nmol glucose uptake for M16, ICR, M16 x ICR and ICR x M16, respectively, P > 0.63). Selection for growth in mice did not result in more energetically efficient jejunal glucose absorption.


KEY WORDS: • nutrient transport • glucose • oxygen consumption • intestine • mice

1 The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Research Service of the products named or similar ones not mentioned.

2 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

3 Present address: Department of Animal Science, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.

4 Present address: Department of Poultry Science.

5 To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed.

Manuscript received 14 November 1995. Revision accepted 7 July 1996.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1996 by American Society for Nutrition