Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 125 No. 3_Suppl March 1995, pp. 686-691
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ashendel, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ashendel, C. L.

Diet, Signal Transduction and Carcinogenesis1

Curtis L. Ashendel

Department of Medicinal Chemistry and Pharmacognosy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907

The defects in the regulation of cell growth and differentiation that manifest themselves as cancer result from multiple defective genes and their products, which are involved in the processes of cellular signaling, regulation of gene expression and control of the cell through its replication cycle. Each of these molecular defects represents a new target for development of novel therapeutic agents and prophylactic interventions. Evidence suggests that such therapeutic agents will show great efficacy for cells made cancerous by the single targeted defect. However, poor anticancer efficacy for clinically presenting cancer may occur as a result of the multiple molecular lesions. A combined-agent approach seems likely to be more successful, but this will require diagnosis of each tumor in substantially greater detail, down to the molecular level. When such molecular diagnosis becomes generally feasible, it should be possible to use combinations of highly specific agents at very low doses for therapy and ultimately for prevention of tumor metastasis. Chemoprevention in general may be achieved more easily than therapy with mechanism-based interventions, as certain individual lesions, in theory, may be rate limiting for carcinogenesis but may not be a significant contributor to the neoplastic phenotype by the time the tumor presents in the clinic.


KEY WORDS: • cancer • carcinogenesis • signal transduction • chemoprevention • cancer treatment

1 Presented at the First International Symposium on the Role of Soy in Preventing and Treating Chronic Disease, held in Mesa, AZ February 20–23, 1994. The symposium was sponsored by Protein Technologies International, the soybean growers from Nebraska Indiana and Iowa and the United Soybean Board. Guest editors for this symposium were Mark Messina, 1543 Lincoln Street, Port Townsend, WA 98368, and John W. Erdman, Jr., Division of Nutritional Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801-3852.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]