Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Livesey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Livesey, G.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, J. C.

Whole Body Metabolism Is Not Restricted to D-Sugars because Energy Metabolism of L-Sugars Fits a Computational Model in Rats1,2,

G. Livesey3 and J. C. Brown

Institute of Food Research, Norwich Laboratory, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UA, United Kingdom

Can L-sugars contribute to whole body energy metabolism? Energy balance studies were undertaken in rats fed L-sugars at a rate of 10 g/100 g basal diet. Partial metabolizable energy values (MEVp) during the last 28 of 56 d while consuming the L-sugars diets showed that L-glucose contributed no energy (0.3 ± 0.9 kJ/g, P > 0.5, mean ± SEM), whereas L-fructose and L-gulose contributed 6.9 ± 0.9 (P < 0.001) and 8.8 ± 1.8 (P < 0.001) kJ/g, respectively. Over periods from 0 to 28 and 0 to 56 d of L-sugar treatment, measurements were made of energy intake, the average lean mass of animals, fat and lean mass deposition. Using these measurements and a computational model, estimates were made of each supplement's net metabolizable energy value for maintenance (NEVs). These estimates confirmed the supply of energy from L-fructose, with NEVs of 5.6 ± 3.2 (P < 0.02) and 6.1 ± 1.7 (P < 0.01) kJ/g over 28 and 56 d, respectively, and L-gulose with NEVs of 10.2 ± 3.4 (P < 0.01) and 11.4 ± 1.8 (P < 0.001) kJ/g over 28 and 56 d, respectively. A lack of energy supply from L-glucose was confirmed with NEVs of -2.6 ± 3.2 (P > 0.5) and 0.0 ± 1.6 (P > 0.5) kJ/g over 28 and 56 d, respectively. As reference substrates, sucrose and cellulose gave expected energy values in all determinations. Methods comparison analysis showed no differences between MEVp and NEVs. The assimilation of energy from L-fructose and L-gulose is probably via large bowel microorganisms. These observations show that L-gulose and L-fructose contribute to whole body energy metabolism while L-glucose does not.


KEY WORDS: L-sugars • food energy value • body composition • metabolic modeling • rats

1 Support by Lev-O-Cal, c/o Biospherics Inc., Beltsville, MD.

2 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

3 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Manuscript received 28 November 1994. Revision accepted 10 July 1995.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1995 by American Society for Nutrition