Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 125 No. 12 December 1995, pp. 2972-2984
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Escamilla, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sanghvi, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pérez-Escamilla, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sanghvi, T.

Exclusive Breast-Feeding Duration Is Associated with Attitudinal, Socioeconomic and Biocultural Determinants in Three Latin American Countries1,2,3,4,

Rafael Pérez-Escamilla*,5, Chessa Lutter{dagger}, Maria Segall**, Ada Rivera{ddagger}, Sandra Treviño-Siller{dagger}{dagger} and Tina Sanghvi{ddagger}{ddagger}

* Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT {dagger} Wellstart International, Washington, DC ** Department of Epidemiology, University of Campinas, Brazil {ddagger} Instituto Hondureño de Seguridad Social, San Pedro Sula, Honduras {dagger}{dagger} Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico {ddagger}{ddagger} Latin American and Caribbean Health and Nutrition Sustainability Project (LAC\HNS), Washington, DC.

International health organizations have recommended exclusive breast-feeding (EBF) (i.e., breast milk as the only source of food) as the optimal infant feeding method during the first 4–6 mo of life. Therefore, it is important to document the determinants of EBF in different populations. Low-income urban women from Brazil (n = 446, 2 maternity wards), Honduras (n = 1582, 3 maternity wards) and Mexico (n = 765, 3 maternity wards) were interviewed at birth and in their homes at 1 mo and 2–4 mo after delivery. Multivariate survival analyses (Cox model) indicated that planned duration of EBF (all 3 countries), having a female Infant, and not being employed (Brazil and Honduras), lower socioeconomic status (Honduras and Mexico) and higher birth weight (control hospital in Brazil and Honduras) were positively associated (P ≤ 0.10) with EBF. Women who delivered in the maternity wards that had more developed breast-feeding promotion programs were more successful with EBF. The association between maternal education and EBF was modified by the maternity ward in Mexico and Honduras. Being ≥ 18 y and having a partner living (Brazil) or not (Mexico) living at home were positively associated with EBF. These findings can contribute toward the design of EBF promotion efforts in Latin America.


KEY WORDS: • exclusive breast-feeding • human lactation • infant feeding determinants • Latin America

1 Portions of this paper were presented at the 122nd annual meeting of the American Public Health Association. Pérez-Escamilla, R., Lutter, C.K., Segall, A., Teruya, K., Rivera, A., Philipps, M., Treviño-Siller, S., Wickham, C. & Sanghvi, T. (1994) When and why women stop exclusive breastfeeding in low-income urban areas from Latin America, Abstract no. 1068, p. 37. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC.

2 Supported by the United States Agency for International Development under Contract No. LAC-0657-C-00-0051 Health and Nutrition Sustainability, University Research Corporation/International Science and Technology Institute.

3 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

4 Scientific Contribution No. 1629, Storrs Agricultural Experimental Station, University of Connecticut, Storrs.

5 To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Manuscript received 19 April 1995. Revision accepted 22 August 1995.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]