![]() |
|
|
Department of Health Science, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Department of Human Nutrition, Agricultural University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
Evidence of a direct relationship between dietary calcium and bone mass in young adults is inconsistent. Therefore, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the existing literature concerning this relation in premenopausal women and adult men between the ages of 18 and 50. A computer-aided search of published papers from 1966 through 1994 was conducted. The quality of each study was assessed by examining the study design. The results of the well-designed studies were combined to obtain quantitative conclusions. A total of 33 eligible studies were identified in the literature, representing 27 cross-sectional studies, two longitudinal and four intervention studies. The results of the cross-sectional studies in premenopausal females showed a significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.13, 95%-confldence interval = 0.090.16) as well as partial correlation coefficient (partial r = 0.08, 95%-confidence interval = 0.050.12), both weighted by sample size. The intervention studies found that calcium supplementation of
1000 mg/d in premenopausal women can prevent the loss of 1% of bone/y at all bone sites except in the ulna. In conclusion, the studies published to date seem to offer overall evidence that calcium intake is positively associated with bone mass in premenopausal females. This association is fairly consistent across the different study designs and is strengthened by the fact that the results are based only on studies with a high methodological quality. In males, too few studies (only three) were published to draw firm conclusions.
KEY WORDS: calcium intake bone mass premenopausal females adult males meta-analysis
1 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2 To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed: Vander Boechorststr. 7-9 1091 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Manuscript received 5 May 1995. Revision accepted 29 June 1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. V. Tyler, J. J. Werner, V. Panaite, S. M. Snyder, D. B. Ford, J. L. Conway, C. W. Young, B. L. Powell, M. J. Smolak, and S. J. Zyzanski Barriers to Supplemental Calcium Use Among Women in Suburban Family Practice: A Report from the Cleveland Clinic Ambulatory Research Network (CleAR-eN) J Am Board Fam Med, July 1, 2008; 21(4): 293 - 299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H Tilg, A R Moschen, A Kaser, A Pines, and I Dotan Gut, inflammation and osteoporosis: basic and clinical concepts Gut, May 1, 2008; 57(5): 684 - 694. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Comstock A Sociological Perspective on Television Violence and Aggression American Behavioral Scientist, April 1, 2008; 51(8): 1184 - 1211. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. R. French, F. Vernace-Inserra, and G. A. Hawker A Prospective Study to Identify Factors Affecting Adherence to Recommended Daily Calcium Intake in Women with Low Bone Mineral Density J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2008; 27(1): 88 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Ahn, D. Albanes, U. Peters, A. Schatzkin, U. Lim, M. Freedman, N. Chatterjee, G. L. Andriole, M. F. Leitzmann, R. B. Hayes, et al. Dairy Products, Calcium Intake, and Risk of Prostate Cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2007; 16(12): 2623 - 2630. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. J. Huth, D. B. DiRienzo, and G. D. Miller Major scientific advances with dairy foods in nutrition and health. J Dairy Sci, April 1, 2006; 89(4): 1207 - 1221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||