![]() |
|
|
Department of Nutrition and the Program in International Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8669 * La Liga de Lactancia Materna/Honduras, San Pedro Sula, Honduras
Low income, primiparous mothers who had exclusively breast-fed for 4 mo were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) continued exclusive breast-feeding to 6 mo (EBF), 2) introduction of complementary foods at 4 mo, with ad libitum nursing 46 mo (SF), and 3) introduction of complementary foods at 4 mo, with maintenance of base-line nursing frequency 46 mo (SF-M). After the intervention phase (46 mo; n = 141), home visits were conducted for a subsample at 9 (n = 60) and 12 (n = 123) mo. At each visit, an observer recorded infant food intake at the midday meal and interviewed the mother regarding usual feeding patterns and the infant's acceptance of 20 common food items. All but two infants (1.5%) were breast-fed to 9 mo and all but eight (6%) to 12 mo. There were no significant differences among groups in breast-feeding frequency, amount or number of foods consumed at the midday meal, percentage of food offered that was consumed, usual daily number of meals and snacks, number of food groups consumed, or overall food acceptance score. Frequency of consumption of foods from eight different food groups (dairy, meats, eggs, grains, beans, fruits, vegetables, tubers) was not significantly different among groups except that, at 9 mo only, the SF group (but not the SF-M group) consumed more vegetables than did the EBF group. These results indicate that delaying the introduction of complementary foods until 6 mo does not adversely affect appetite or food acceptance among breast-fed infants.
KEY WORDS: infant feeding breastfeeding food acceptance weaning complementary foods
1 Presented at Experimental Biology 94, Anaheim, CA [Dewey, K. G., Cohen, R. J., Landa Rivera, L., Canahuati, J. & Brown, K. H. (1984) Does delaying the introduction of complementary foods until 6 mo affect appetite, food acceptance or growth of breastfed infants from 6 to 12 mo in a low-income, Honduran population? FASEB J. 8: A698 (abs.)].
2 Supported jointly by the Thrasher Research Fund; the World Health Organization; UNICEF/Honduras and the Institute for Reproductive Health (formerly the Institute for International Studies in Natural Family Planning), Georgetown University, under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. Agency for International Development (A.I.D.) (DPE-3040-A-00-5064-00 and DPE-3061-A-00-1029-00). The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of these institutions. Complementary foods were provided at reduced cost by Gerber Products Company.
3 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
4 To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed.
Manuscript received 16 March 1995. Revision accepted 29 June 1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Li, F. Fridinger, and L. Grummer-Strawn Public Perceptions on Breastfeeding Constraints J Hum Lact, August 1, 2002; 18(3): 227 - 235. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. F. Rea, S. I. Venancio, L. E. Batista, and T. Greiner Determinants of the Breastfeeding Pattern Among Working Women in Sdo Paulo J Hum Lact, September 1, 1999; 15(3): 233 - 239. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Greiner The Concept of Weaning: Definitions and Their Implications J Hum Lact, June 1, 1996; 12(2): 123 - 128. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||