Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 125 No. 11 November 1995, pp. 2787-2792
Copyright © 1995 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, R. J.
Right arrow Articles by Dewey, K. G.

Delaying the Introduction of Complementary Food until 6 Months does not Affect Appetite or Mother's Report of Food Acceptance of Breast-Fed Infants from 6 to 12 Months in a Low Income, Honduran Population1,2,3,

Roberta J. Cohen, Leonardo Landa Rivera*, Judy Canahuati*, Kenneth H. Brown and Kathryn G. Dewey4

Department of Nutrition and the Program in International Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616-8669 * La Liga de Lactancia Materna/Honduras, San Pedro Sula, Honduras

Low income, primiparous mothers who had exclusively breast-fed for 4 mo were randomly assigned to one of three groups: 1) continued exclusive breast-feeding to 6 mo (EBF), 2) introduction of complementary foods at 4 mo, with ad libitum nursing 4–6 mo (SF), and 3) introduction of complementary foods at 4 mo, with maintenance of base-line nursing frequency 4–6 mo (SF-M). After the intervention phase (4–6 mo; n = 141), home visits were conducted for a subsample at 9 (n = 60) and 12 (n = 123) mo. At each visit, an observer recorded infant food intake at the midday meal and interviewed the mother regarding usual feeding patterns and the infant's acceptance of 20 common food items. All but two infants (1.5%) were breast-fed to 9 mo and all but eight (6%) to 12 mo. There were no significant differences among groups in breast-feeding frequency, amount or number of foods consumed at the midday meal, percentage of food offered that was consumed, usual daily number of meals and snacks, number of food groups consumed, or overall food acceptance score. Frequency of consumption of foods from eight different food groups (dairy, meats, eggs, grains, beans, fruits, vegetables, tubers) was not significantly different among groups except that, at 9 mo only, the SF group (but not the SF-M group) consumed more vegetables than did the EBF group. These results indicate that delaying the introduction of complementary foods until 6 mo does not adversely affect appetite or food acceptance among breast-fed infants.


KEY WORDS: • infant feeding • breastfeeding • food acceptance • weaning • complementary foods

1 Presented at Experimental Biology 94, Anaheim, CA [Dewey, K. G., Cohen, R. J., Landa Rivera, L., Canahuati, J. & Brown, K. H. (1984) Does delaying the introduction of complementary foods until 6 mo affect appetite, food acceptance or growth of breastfed infants from 6 to 12 mo in a low-income, Honduran population? FASEB J. 8: A698 (abs.)].

2 Supported jointly by the Thrasher Research Fund; the World Health Organization; UNICEF/Honduras and the Institute for Reproductive Health (formerly the Institute for International Studies in Natural Family Planning), Georgetown University, under a Cooperative Agreement with the U.S. Agency for International Development (A.I.D.) (DPE-3040-A-00-5064-00 and DPE-3061-A-00-1029-00). The views expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the views of these institutions. Complementary foods were provided at reduced cost by Gerber Products Company.

3 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

4 To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed.

Manuscript received 16 March 1995. Revision accepted 29 June 1995.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
R. Li, F. Fridinger, and L. Grummer-Strawn
Public Perceptions on Breastfeeding Constraints
J Hum Lact, August 1, 2002; 18(3): 227 - 235.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
M. F. Rea, S. I. Venancio, L. E. Batista, and T. Greiner
Determinants of the Breastfeeding Pattern Among Working Women in Sdo Paulo
J Hum Lact, September 1, 1999; 15(3): 233 - 239.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Hum LactHome page
T. Greiner
The Concept of Weaning: Definitions and Their Implications
J Hum Lact, June 1, 1996; 12(2): 123 - 128.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]