Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oyemade, U. J.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Oyemade, U. J.
Right arrow Articles by Edwards, C. H.

Prenatal Predictors of Performance on the Brazelton Neonatal Behavioral Assessment Scale1

Ura Jean Oyemade2, O. Jackson Cole{dagger}, Allan A. Johnson*, Enid M. Knight*, Ouida E. Westney, Haziel Laryea{dagger}, Gloria Hill{dagger}, Elaine Cannon{dagger}, A. Fomufod{dagger}*, Lennox S. Westney{dagger}{dagger}, Sidney Jones** and Cecile H. Edwards*

* Department of Nutritional Sciences, Department of Human Development {dagger}{dagger} Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology {dagger}* Department of Pediatrics {dagger} Nutrition Program Project, Howard University ** D. C. General Hospital, Howard University Hospital, Washington, D. C. 20059

The present study presents a prospective analysis of the interrelationships among prenatal medical, nutritional (dietary and biochemical) and behavioral determinants of Brazelton performance. Previous researchers (Scanlon 1984, Lester and Brazelton 1984) have raised questions regarding the relative roles of medical factors, nutrition, ponderal index and other behavioral factors in neonatal performance on the BNBAS.

Four hundred sixty-seven predominantly Black nulliparous women and their neonates in Washington, D.C. who were enrolled in the study by the 20th week of gestation were subjects.

Results of univariate tests of significant (P < 0.01) association between independent variables and Brazelton clusters from scores measured on day 2 are presented. The 26 behavioral items were summarized into 6 clusters as done in similar studies by linearizing measures made on a curvilinear scale and taking the mean. The 6 behavioral clusters are habituation, motor, orientation, range of states, regulation of states, and autonomic. Results of 16 reflex tests are used to define a seventh reflex cluster. Independent variables included demographic, lifestyle, nutritional, medical, ponderal index, and psychosocial measures.

Several psychosocial variables, including stress, anxiety and partner interaction were associated with the behavioral clusters. Nutritional variables were associated with BNBAS habituation, motor, orientation, reflex score and autonomic responses.

An analysis of co-variance was performed to determine the joint effect of the above variables on the variation in the Brazelton performance on the seven cluster scores. Five of the seven models (orientation, motor, range of states, autonomic, and reflex scores) were significant predictors of the outcome variables.


KEY WORDS: • neonatal behavior • Brazelton performance • African American women

1 The investigations reported in this paper were made as part of the program project "Nutrition, Other Factors and the Outcome of Pregnancy," supported by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, through a grant in 1985 to the Department of Human Nutrition and Food, School of Human Ecology, Howard University. Guest Editor for this supplement volume to The Journal of Nutrition was Cecile H. Edwards, Department of Nutritional Sciences, College of Allied Health Sciences, Howard University, Washington, D. C. 20059. Tapes of the data are available at cost by sending a written request to the Guest Editor at the above address. Supported by Grant 3 PO1 HD17104-05, ENG, NICHD, NIH.

2 To whom correspondence should be addressed: Department of Human Development, School of Education, Howard University, Washington, D.C. 20059.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1994 by American Society for Nutrition