QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ballevre, O. Articles by Fern, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ballevre, O. Articles by Fern, E.

Use of the Doubly-Labeled Water Method to Assess Energy Expenditure in Free Living Cats and Dogs^1,2,

Nestec Ltd. (Friskies Research), 1000 Lausanne 26, Switzerland

The doubly-labeled water method uses naturally occurring stable isotopes of water (H₂ ¹⁸O and D₂O) to assess energy expenditure, body composition and water flux in animals and humans. The technique is relatively noninvasive (a few blood or urine samples over 2 wk) and is performed in free living conditions during a period of between 5 and 20 d. This is the first report of the use of the method in three cats and two dogs. The measured energy expenditure during 11 d was 207 ± 12 and 263 kJ·kg^-1·d^-1 for cats and dogs, respectively. These values were 30 and 10% lower, respectively, than NRC recommendations for energy requirement (NRC 1985, NRC 1986). The percentage body fat was 23 ± 5% in the three cats and 35% in the two dogs used in this study. The water output (urine + breath) was 36 ± 4 ml·kg^-1·d^-1 for the cats and 60 ml·kg^-1·d^-1 for the dogs. Of the water output, 23% (cats) and 17% (dogs) was lost as insensible water loss. The precision and accuracy of the method are discussed in relation to the assumptions made with this technique and by comparison with published values.

KEY WORDS: • doubly-labeled water • cat • dog • energy requirement

¹ Presented as part of the Waltham Symposium on the Nutrition of Companion Animals in association with the 15th International Congress of Nutrition at Adelaide, SA, Australia, on September 23–25, 1993. Guest editors for this symposium were Kay Earle, John Mercer and D'Ann Finley.

² To whom correspondence should be addressed.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. C. Hill Challenges in Measuring Energy Expenditure in Companion Animals: A Clinician's Perspective J. Nutr., July 1, 2006; 136(7): 1967S - 1972S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]