Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 122 No. 1 January 1992, pp. 203-210
Copyright © 1992 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harmon, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harmon, D. L.

Dietary Influences on Carbohydrases and Small Intestinal Starch Hydrolysis Capacity in Ruminants1,2,3,

David L. Harmon

Department of Animal Sciences and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-1600

Data describing the influence of diet composition and intake on amylolytic and disaccharidase activities in the ruminant small intestine are reviewed. Changing dietary components from forage to grain increased pancreatic {alpha}-amylase activities in most studies; however, when metabolizable energy intake was equalized, concentrations of {alpha}-amylase in the pancreas and the total quantities in the small intestinal lumen were greater in forage-fed than in grain-fed animals. Concentration of pancreatic {alpha}-amylase increased with dietary energy intake. Changing diet composition or metabolizable energy intake exerted a small effect on intestinal disaccharidase activities, with hydrolytic capacity altered principally through changes in intestinal length. Other studies suggest a small contribution of intestinal disappearance of carbohydrates to net portal appearance of glucose. The fate of large portions of intestinal carbohydrate disappearance have not been adequately defined. For the importance of intestinal carbohydrate supply to be understood, the quantity of carbohydrate undergoing both enzymatic hydrolysis and absorption must be determined.


KEY WORDS: • ruminants • starch • digestion • small intestine

1 Presented at the 31st Annual Ruminant Nutrition Conference, entitled "Starch Digestion: Understanding and Potential for Improvement," at the Annual Meeting of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, April 1, 1990, Washington, DC.

2 Guest editor for this symposium was C. B. Theurer, Department of Animal Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.

3 Contribution No. 90-435-J of the Kansas Agricultural Experimental Station.

Manuscript received 26 June 1991. Revision accepted 16 July 1991.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
G. B. Huntington, D. L. Harmon, and C. J. Richards
Sites, rates, and limits of starch digestion and glucose metabolism in growing cattle
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E14 - E.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]