Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Heusner, A. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Heusner, A. A.

Body Mass, Maintenance and Basal Metabolism in Dogs1

A. A. Heusner

Department of Physiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

Basal metabolism and body mass are related by the metabolic power function: P = aMb, where P = basal metabolism in Watts, a = mass coefficient, M = body mass in kg, and b = mass exponent. The mass exponent of 117 dogs from the literature bdog = 0.885 {mp} 0.024 (r = 0.960; F = 1387; df = 1, 115). This mass exponent is significantly greater than the commonly accepted value of 0.75 for mammals. The dog's 95% confidence ellipse is compared with that of mammals with body mass (M) < 3.2 kg (the lower limit of the mass range in dogs) and > 3.2 kg. When M > 3.2 kg the interspecific metabolic mass exponent (b1) in mammals is also significantly greater than 0.75 and not different from bdog (b1 = 0.869 {mp} 0.034; r = 0.919; F = 648; df = 1, 120). In mammals M < 3.2 kg b1 is significantly smaller than 0.75 (b1 = 0.634 {mp} 0.010; r = 0.941; F = 4319; df = 1, 561). These data show that in mammals the relationship between the logarithms of basal metabolism and body mass is not accurately described by a single regression line. They also indicate that the commonly accepted 0.75 mass exponent is not applicable to the prediction of basal metabolism in dogs and mammals. The relationship between body mass and maintenance energy metabolism (MEM) in 332 dogs shows that the prediction interval is too wide to reasonably predict MEM in individual dogs. However, the minimum maintenance energy metabolism (MMEM in Watts) can be accurately predicted by a simple algorithm: MMEM = 10.3 + 1.41 x M. The theoretical meaning of the basal metabolic power function is discussed.


KEY WORDS: • symposium • dogs • basal metabolism • body mass • maintenance metabolism • minimum maintenance metabolism

1 Presented as part of the Waltham International Symposium on Nutrition of Small Companion Animals, at University of California, Davis, CA 95616, on September 4–8, 1990. Guest editors for the symposium were James G. Morris, D'Ann C. Finley and Quinton R. Rogers.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. Kozlowski, M. Konarzewski, and A. T. Gawelczyk
Cell size as a link between noncoding DNA and metabolic rate scaling
PNAS, November 25, 2003; 100(24): 14080 - 14085.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1991 by American Society for Nutrition