Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 12 No. 6 December 1936, pp. 613-644
Copyright © 1936 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murlin, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barrows, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Murlin, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Barrows, W. M., Jr.

The Specific Dynamic Action of Butter Fat, and of Superimposed Sugar

Six Figures

John R. Murlin, Alan C. Burton and W. M. Barrows, Jr.

Department of Vital Economics, The University of Rochester

1. The specific dynamic action of butter fat, eaten as heavy cream, was studied in nine human subjects by means of the new semi-automatic respiration calorimeter, supplemented by the Tissot-Haldane method. Amounts of fat contained in the test meal varied from 80 to 171 gm. S.D.A. experiments occurred on the fourth or fifth day of an all-cream diet.
2. For non-protein respiratory quotients less than 0.707, heat values for oxygen below the Zuntz-Shumburg table were found by the formula
Figure 1
. The method assumes that all of the non-protein CO2 under these conditions comes from combustion of fat and that all of the extra oxygen is used for some other purpose than immediate combustion. Direct and indirect calorimetry agreed remarkably well, thus tending to confirm the assumption.
3. Plausible S.D.A. curves showing the entire course of extra heat production over basal were possible for all subjects but one. The average S.D.A. expressed as a percentage of the fat calories fed was 4.74. Not more than 6% of the calory content was from other foodstuffs. The figures agree fairly well with those of Murlin and Lusk ('15) on the dog.
4. There is no relation of S.D.A. to age, for lowest effects were obtained from the youngest and oldest subjects. It is, however, related to tolerance for fat, meaning not only capacity to digest but also capacity to metabolize completely.
5. With six subjects sugar (sucrose or glucose C.P.7) was superimposed on the high fat at an ‘early’ interval (3 to 5 hours) after the fat meal was taken and the same amount again at a ‘late’ interval (11 to 15 hours), for the purpose of testing its combustibility. The dynamic response to the sugar was of two types, a) complete summation to the fat metabolism, and b) an increase greater than that due to the same amount of sugar fed alone; the difference is reckoned as fat metabolism. The extra heat may come in part from oxidation of ketone bodies induced by the sugar (see following paper). With three subjects the sugar, glucose, fructose and sucrose, respectively, was given twice at equal intervals after last fat and the combustibility and dynamic effects compared.
6. There is no doubt from these experiments that a strong dynamic effect from sugar may be obtained without any evidence of its own combustion; where such evidence (higher R.Q.) was obtained there was no proportionality to the dynamic effect.
7. The S.D.A. of fat does not appear to be due entirely to plethora in the sense of Lusk, for a) it does not run parallel to blood fat, and b) sugar superimposed causes increased combustion of fat.


7 Supplied by Corn Industries Research Foundation.

Manuscript received 15 July 1936.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]