Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 118 No. 9 September 1988, pp. 1137-1142
Copyright © 1988 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamath, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamath, S. K.
Right arrow Articles by Ghosh, L.

Amino Acid-Restricted Diets in the Treatment of Mammary Adenocarcinoma in Mice1,2,

Savitri K. Kamath, Nan C. Conrad, Ronald E. Olson, Mary Bess Kohrs and Luna Ghosh

Department of Nutrition and Medical Dietetics and Department of Pathology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612

The effect of a diet moderately restricted in tryptophan on the tumor and the nutritional status of C3H mice bearing mammary adenocarcinoma was examined. Five groups of female tumor-bearing mice were fed ad libitum a diet containing 1) 15% casein, 2) 15% amino acid mixture, 3) 15% amino acid mixture restricted in tryptophan 4) 15% zein supplemented with lysine and tryptophan or 5) 15% zein supplemented with lysine and restricted in tryptophan. Another group of tumor-free mice of similar age fed 15% casein served as a control for the tumor-bearing group fed the 15% casein diet. Moderate restriction of tryptophan in the diet appeared to have no effect on the tumor status of the animal. Tumor burden usually induced malnutrition in the animal. However, tryptophan restriction did not further aggravate this malnutrition. The source of protein, whether casein, amino acid mixture or zein, appeared to make a difference in nutritional status of tumor-bearing animals though not in tumor status. Casein-fed animals generally tended to have higher values for all the nutritional markers studied than did animals fed the amino acid mixture or zein.


KEY WORDS: • tryptophan restriction • mammary adenocarcinoma • malnutrition

1 Supported by the Campus Research Board of the University of Illinois at Chicago.

2 Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, New Orleans, LA, April, 1982 [KAMATH, S. K., CONRAD, N. C., KOHRS, M. B. & GHOSH, L. (1982) Effect of dietary protein on tumor growth and protein status of C3H mice. Fed. Proc. 41: 355 (abs. 503)].

Manuscript received 4 August 1987. Revision accepted 12 April 1988.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]