Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 116 No. 8 August 1986, pp. 1385-1389
Copyright © 1986 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pesti, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ware, G. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pesti, G. M.
Right arrow Articles by Ware, G. O.

Expressing the Variability in Results of Metabolizable Energy Assays1

G. M. Pesti* and G. O. Ware{dagger}

* Department of Poultry Science {dagger} Agricultural Experiment Stations, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602

In estimating the metabolizable energy of a food or feedstuff (MEf), the ME of a reference diet (MEr, containing glucose monohydrate) and the ME of a test (MEt, containing the feedstuff substituted for glucose) are determined from a feeding trial:
Figure 1
where P is a proportion of substitution. Tradionally,
Figure 2
has been used in calculating the variance of MEf as if it were measured without error, leading to an underestimation of the variance in MEf. Variances of MEf estimated by a method based on the variances
Figure 3
and MEt were 4–11% greater for sample data. Underestimation of variances can lead to excess confidence in ME estimates. Too few replicates may be used for the desired confidence. Figures depicting the influence of replication and degree of substitution are included to help select the replication and proportion of substitution necessary to achieve acceptable results.


KEY WORDS: • metabolizable energy • bioassay • variance

1 Supported by State and Hatch funds allocated to the Georgia Agricultural Experiment Stations of the University of Georgia.

Manuscript received 23 October 1985. Revision accepted 21 March 1986.







Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]