QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Nauss, K. M. Articles by Newberne, P. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Nauss, K. M. Articles by Newberne, P. M.

Immunological Changes during Progressive Stages of Vitamin A Deficiency in the Rat¹

Department of Nutrition and Food Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139

The immune status of rats fed a vitamin A-deficient diet (-A) was studied before they reached the weight plateau (stage 1), during the first 5 d of the weight plateau (stage 2) and during late stages of vitamin A deficiency (stage 3). Compared to vitamin A-supplemented (+A) animals, there were no significant differences in the relative splenic weights during the early and later stages of deficiency, but the total yield of isolated splenocytes was lower in -A rats during stages 2 and 3. The weights of the cervical and mesenteric lymph nodes were higher during the later stages of deficiency. In the spleen, concanavalin A (Con A)-induced responses were significantly depressed in -A rats at all three stages of deficiency. In stages 2 and 3 splenic pokeweed mitogen (PWM) responses were lower in -A than in +A rats. There were no changes in lymph node responses in stage 1. The Con A and PWM-induced responses of cervical lymph nodes of -A animals were higher in stages 2 and 3. Mesenteric lymph node responses were also higher in -A rats in stage 3. The alterations in the transformation responses of -A rats could not be explained by changes in the relative proportions of T-cell subsets.

KEY WORDS: • vitamin A deficiency • immunology • lymphocytes • immunocompetence

¹ This investigation was supported in part by Grant EY 03126 from the National Eye Institute, Department of Health and Human Services.

Manuscript received 8 October 1984. Revision accepted 12 March 1985.