Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 114 No. 5 May 1984, pp. 911-919
Copyright © 1984 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafson, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mercer, L. P.
Right arrow Articles by Gustafson, J. M.

A New Protein Quality Evaluation Index Based on Growth Responses of Rats

L. Preston Mercer and Jon M. Gustafson

Department of Biochemistry, Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Oral Roberts University, Tulsa, OK 74171

The protein efficiency ratio (PER) is the official method for protein quality evaluation in the United States and Canada. Two other widely used indices of evaluation are the slope ratio and net protein ratio (NPR) methods. Each of these methods has problems associated with its calculation and interpretation. In this paper, a new index, actual protein utilization (APU) is discussed, and its relationship to the other indices is examined. Each of the indices is given a theoretical basis by relating it to the four parameter mathematical model for physiological responses. To compare the indices, growth bioassays were carried out using male rats (40, 60, 115 g) consuming three different proteins (casein, lactalbumin and soy) and an amino acid mixture (Rogers and Harper). Dose-response curves were generated for each diet, and the indices PER, NPR, Slope and APU were calculated. APU was shown to have certain characteristics that make it superior to the other methods of protein quality evaluation, i.e., it closely approximates the growth response curve and it incorporates a term for the protein intake required for maintenance.


KEY WORDS: • protein • bioassay • biological value

Manuscript received 26 September 1983.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]