Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Diaz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stamper, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Diaz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Stamper, C.

Artificial Rearing of Rat Pups with a Protein-Enriched Formula1,2,

Jaime Diaz, Elizabeth Moore, Frances Petracca, Jack Schacher and Colleen Stamper

Department of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195

Neonatal Long-Evans hooded rat pups were assigned to one of three groups: 1) pups normally reared, 2) pups implanted with intragastric cannulas and artificially reared with a common milk replacement formula, 3) pups implanted with intragastric cannulas and artificially reared with a protein-enriched milk formula. Daily body weights were recorded, as were the ontogeny of various reflexes. On day 18, the animals were behaviorally tested and then killed. There were no differences among the three groups in daily body weights, nor in the ontogeny of reflexive behavior. There were no differences in the wet weights of caudal brain sections, but the normally reared animals had significantly larger rostral brain sections than either artificially reared group. While cerebella of normally reared animals were significantly larger than those of the two artificially reared groups, there was a significant trend towards more normal cerebellar weights with the addition of protein in the formula of artificially reared animals. Behavioral tests indicated that the animals artificially reared have significantly different behavior than normally reared animals. However, compared to animals artificially reared using a common milk formula, animals artificially reared with additional protein in their formula behave more like normally reared animals.


KEY WORDS: • artificially reared rats • protein-enriched milk formula • open field test • gastrostomy

1 Supported by a grant from the Graduale School Research Fund of the University of Washington; and by a grant from the Alcoholism and Drug Abuse Institute of the University of Washington.

2 A preliminary report of this study was presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, Cincinnati, OH. 1980. Diaz. J., Stamper, C., Moore, E., Schacher, J. & Petracca, F. (1980) Enriched protein intake during early brain growth of artificially reared rats. Neuroaci. Abst., 6, 326.

Manuscript received 11 September 1981.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Lab AnimHome page
S J Henare, D J Mellor, R G Lentle, and P J Moughan
An appraisal of the strengths and weaknesses of newborn and juvenile rat models for researching gastrointestinal development
Lab Anim, July 1, 2008; 42(3): 231 - 245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1982 by American Society for Nutrition