Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 112 No. 10 October 1982, pp. 1906-1913
Copyright © 1982 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blass, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barclay, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Blass, J. P.

Cholinergic Therapy of Abnormal Open-Field Behavior in Thiamin-Deficient Rats1

Laurie L. Barclay, Gary E. Gibson and John P. Blass

Department of Neurology, Cornell University Medical College, Burke Rehabilitation Center, 785 Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, NY 10605

Although thiamin deficiency is associated with impaired acetylcholine metabolism, the functional significance of the cholinergic lesion is controversial. Therefore, we tested the effect of cholinergic drugs on abnormal open-field behaviors in rats that were treated with a thiamin-deficient diet and thiamin antagonists. After only 1 day of treatment, staring increased significantly in rats given pyrithiamin, a centrally acting thiamine antagonist, but not in rats given oxythiamin, which acts only peripherally. Sniffing, resting and grooming were not altered by either treatment. The acetylcholinesterase inhibitor physostigmine was as effective as thiamin in decreasing staring in pyrithiamin-treated rats, but its peripherally acting analogue neostigmine had no effect. The central muscarinic blocker, atropine, blocked the effect of physostigmine. Methatropine, which acts only peripherally, did not. Arecoline, a direct muscarinic agonist, was as effective as physostigmine in decreasing staring. Nicotine had no effect, and the nicotinic ganglionic blocker mecamylamine did not block the effect of physostigmine. Increased staring behavior in pyrithiamin-treated rats appears to reflect an early central cholinergic muscarinic deficit.


KEY WORDS: • thiamin deficiency • open-field behavior • acetylcholine • pyrithiamin

1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant NS15125. the Winifred Masterson Burke Relief Foundation, the Will Rogers Institute and the Brown and Williamson Tobacco Company.

Manuscript received 8 March 1982.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]