Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Journal of Nutrition Vol. 112 No. 10 October 1982, pp. 1843-1853
Copyright © 1982 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burns, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Milner, John. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burns, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Milner, John. A.

Effects of Dietary Protein Quantity and Quality on the Growth of Dogs and Rats1

Robert A. Burns, Mary H. LeFaivre and John. A. Milner

Department of Food Science, University of Illinois, 905 S. Goodwin Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801

The growth of immature beagle dogs and weanling rats fed dietary protein concentrations between 0 and 20% were investigated. With lactalbumin as the protein source, 8- to 10-week-old dogs exhibited optimal growth when the diet supplied between 15 and 20% protein, whereas in older growing dogs (13–17 weeks) maximum growth and feed efficiency occurred with 11.7% dietary protein. Growth and feed efficiency of weanling rats were calculated to be optimal at 11.5% dietary protein. The protein efficiency ratio (PER) calculated during 14 days of feeding a 10% lactalbumin diet was 3.14 for 8- to 10-week-old dogs, 3.42 for 13- to 17-week-old dogs and 3.92 for weanling rats. Subsequent experiments examined the utilization of casein, soy isolate and wheat gluten by immature dogs and weanling rats. When diets contained 10% protein the adjusted PERs of casein, soy and wheat gluten were 2.50, 1.26 and -0.43 for the dog and 2.50, 1.60 and 0.34 for the rat, respectively. At 7.5% protein the adjusted PERs of casein, soy and wheat gluten were 2.50, 1.19 and -3.21 for the dog and 2.50, 1.44 and 0.29 for the rat. Thus, the rat can be a useful model for examining the quality of proteins fed to dogs. However, by using the rat one may overestimate the value of some low quality proteins.

KEY WORDS: • dog • rat • protein requirements • protein quality • urea

1 Supported in part by the Illinois Agricultural Experiment Station.

Manuscript received 26 January 1982.




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]