Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoeneberger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Elmadfa, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoeneberger, H.
Right arrow Articles by Elmadfa, I.

Composition and Protein Quality of Lupinus Mutabilis

H. Schoeneberger, R. Gross1, H. D. Cremer and I. Elmadfa

German Agency for Technical Cooperation, National Institute of Health, Lima, Peru and Institute of Nutrition, University of Giessen, West Germany

The chemical composition and the protein quality of three samples of Lupinus mutabilis (a raw, semi-sweet variety; cooked, water-extracted seeds; and alcohol-extracted oil cake) were studied. The protein content varied from 47.7% dry weight (raw seeds) to 65.3% (oil-cake). Compared to the FAO reference pattern sulfurcontaining amino acids are first limiting. The water-extracted sample contained 26.9% oil and the polyunsaturated/saturated fatty acid ratio of 30 seed samples was 5.3. Alkaloid content of raw seed was high (3.3%), but could be reduced or nearly eliminated by water-and-alcohol extraction or plant breeding. Other anti-nutritive substances were present only in trace quantities. Protein quality measured as protein efficiency ratio (PER) gave low values for the non-supplemented lupin proteins (1.34 semi-sweet variety; 1.53 water-extracted seeds; 1.19 oil-cake; 3.09 casein), but the PER's were improved by the addition of 0.2% DL-methionine to the diets (3.05, 2.69, 2.81, respectively). Raw as well as processed lupin protein showed an excellent apparent digestibility (80.0–85.8%, casein 87.1%). Studies of net protein utilization (NPU) and biological value (BV) confirmed the importance of methionine supplementation. The true digestibility of 92% was equivalent to that of casein.


KEY WORDS: • lupine • chemical composition • anti-nutritive substances • protein quality

1 To whom reprint requests should be sent at this address: Proyecto Lupino, Instituto de Nutrición, Jirón Tizón y Bueno 276, Jesús María, Lima 11, Perú.

Manuscript received 17 February 1981.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1982 by American Society for Nutrition