Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Spangler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Spangler, E.
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D. E.

Influence of Feeding Pattern on Energy Balance and Activity in Rats1

Elizabeth Spangler and Donald E. Johnson

Department of Animal Sciences, Metabolic Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523

The effect of feeding pattern on energy balance and activity of rats was investigated with four treatment groups. Two groups were fed two meals per day at one of two levels (ad libitum or 1.25 times maintenance) and the other two groups were allowed to nibble either unrestricted or in 12 small meals per day. Four-day total collection digestion trials were conducted on individual rats. Pairs of rats were used for simultaneous activity and respiration calorimetry measurements. Meal-eaters gained less weight, digested and metabolized an approximately 4% greater fraction of their gross energy intake and had a 21% lower maintenance energy requirement. Ad libitum nibblers were about 23% more active during the average 24-hour period than high level meal-eaters, although this difference was not statistically significant. The energetic cost of activity as a percent of maintenance energy ranged from 60% to 18%. These estimates are higher than others in the literature and may have been affected by the activity measurement method, but indicate that differences in activity contributed to observed differences in energetic efficiency between meal-fed and nibbler rats.

KEY WORDS: • energy balance • meal pattern • activity

1 Supported by the Colorado State University Experiment Station and published as Scientific Series Paper No. 2571.

Manuscript received 29 July 1980.




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1981 by American Society for Nutrition