Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 11 No. 2 February 1936, pp. 177-190
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. M.
Right arrow Articles by Imboden, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. M., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Imboden, M.

The Mineral Composition of Young Rats

Five Figures

Warren M. Cox, Jr. and Miriam Imboden

Research Laboratory, Mead Johnson & Co., Evansville, Indiana

Data on ten stock and 135 experimental rats, receiving different levels and ratios of calcium and phosphorus, and 8431 young born to these mothers during eleven consecutive reproductive cycles have been compiled. It is noted that: 1) the rat is relatively cartilagenous at birth; 2) the mineral content of the rat at birth is relatively constant, in spite of wide differences in maternal mineral intake; 3) because of constancy in the composition of the body ash of 21-day-old rats, even when their mothers receive varying mineral intakes, the percentage of calcium and phosphorus in their gross bodies is calculable with fair accuracy from the percentage ash; 4) with the exception of high phosphorus diets, the body ash of sucklings (21 days old) may be used as a measure of bone ash, or calcification; 5) female rats, 21 days old, contain more ash, calcium, and phosphorus than do males of the same age; and 6) during consecutive reproductive cycles the number of young born per litter decreases, but the average weight at weaning increases.


Manuscript received 18 September 1935.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]