Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 109 No. 7 July 1979, pp. 1154-1160
Copyright © 1979 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lipschitz, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, E. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lipschitz, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, E. R.

Absorption of Monoferric Phytate by Dogs1,2,

David A. Lipschitz3, Karen M. Simpson, James D. Cook and Eugene R. Morris

Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, and Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Laboratory, Nutrition Institute, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville, Maryland

Recent studies have shown that the iron in wheat is predominantly in the form of monoferric phytate (MFP). Unlike phytate complexed with two or more iron atoms, MFP is soluble at pH 7.0 and above and may therefore be a relatively available form of dietary iron. To examine this point, we tested iron absorption in adult dogs using a double radioisotope method and total body counting. When given without food, MFP was about one-half as available as ferrous sulphate at an iron-equivalent dose of 1.5 mg and only about one-seventh as available at a dose of 15 mg iron. When administered with food, MFP underwent complete isotopic exchange with the nonheme pool of dietary iron. When added to meals of either high or low iron availability in amounts that might be used for iron fortification, the absorption was the same for MFP iron as for the major pool of dietary inorganic iron.


KEY WORDS: • monoferric phytate • food iron absorption • iron fortification • dog

1 This work was supported by cooperative agreement 12-14-1001-1209 from USDA and grant AM-19011 from USPHS.

2 Presented in part at the Annual Meeting, American Institute of Nutrition, Atlantic City, New Jersey, April 9–14, 1978.

3 Present address: Veterans Administration Medical Center and University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Manuscript received 10 October 1978.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
M. Hernandez, V. Sousa, S. Villalpando, A. Moreno, I. Montalvo, and M. Lopez-Alarcon
Cooking and fe fortification have different effects on fe bioavailability of bread and tortillas.
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2006; 25(1): 20 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]