Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, I. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cameron, I. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, W.

Tumor-Host Responses to Various Nutritional Feeding Procedures in Rats1

I. L. Cameron2, W. A. Pavlat, M. D. Stevens and W. Rogers

Departments of Anatomy (I.L.C., W.A.P., M.D.S.) and Surgery (W.R.), The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, Texas 78284

Parenteral and enteral nutrition are being used as adjuncts to cancer therapy. A liquid diet formulation containing a 27% solution of glucose and 3.9% crystalline amino acids with electrolytes and vitamins was given continuously for a week via parenteral (iv), and via intragastric (ig) routes and also was given ad libitum via the oral or per os (po) route to groups of Buffalo rats with and without a Morris #7777 transplantable hepatoma to find out how these feeding procedures affect tumor-host interactions. Other groups of rats with and without the hepatoma were given solid food ad libitum. The following parameters were examined: mortality, carcass and organ weights, body and tumor growth, nitrogen balance, energy intake, fluid balance, urinalysis, hematology values, and serum protein levels. The results are considered with respect to the influence of the tumor on the host and the influence of the feeding procedure on the animal with and without a tumor. The presence of the hepatoma was associated with: higher mortality, a decrease in carcass mass, leucocytosis, anemia, a decrease in serum IgG, transferrin and albumin, and an increase in serum alpha fetoprotein. The iv and ig feeding procedures alone resulted in some mortality which was was exacerbated by the presence of the tumor. Mortality was especially high in the tumorous rats on the ig feeding procedure. The degree of positive nitrogen balance and carcass mass was similar in non-tumorous rats fed the same liquid diet formula when given iv, ig, or po. Tumorous rats fed the liquid diet ad libitum showed anorexia and a significantly lower nitrogen balance. The iv and ig feeding of tumorous rats at a level which was well above those of the tumorous rats given solid or liquid diet ad libitum maintained the same degree of positive nitrogen balance as non-tumorous rats. Even though the iv feeding of tumorous rats maintained about the same degree of positive nitrogen balance as non-tumorous rats, these tumorous rats still suffered loss of carcass mass. It appears that the large rapidly growing hepatoma has priority for available nutrition over the host. It is further suggested that the rapidly growing hepatoma places an ever increasing demand on the available nutrients. Thus, a point is eventually reached where even supplemental nutritional support can no longer meet the needs of the growing hepatoma and the host.


KEY WORDS: • parenteral nutrition • cancer • hepatoma • cachexia • iv feeding • rats

1 Supported by Public Health Service Grant CA16831 from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health, Education and Welfare.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed.

Manuscript received 25 July 1978.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
J. W. Mccarrick III, C. B. Ikeda, and M. M. Ziegler
Tumor Immunogenicity--The Prime Determinant of the Nutritional Influence on the Host-Tumor Relationship
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, January 1, 1986; 10(1): 21 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
S. Lanza-Jacoby, H. S. Sitren, N. R. Stevenson, and F. E. Rosato
Changes in Circadian Rhythmicity of Liver and Serum Parameters in Rats Fed a Total Parenteral Nutrition Solution by Continuous and Discontinuous Intravenous or Intragastric Infusion
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, November 1, 1982; 6(6): 496 - 502.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
T. Kishi, Y. Iwasawa, H. Itoh, and I. Chibata
Nutritional Responses of Tumor-bearing Rats to Oral or Intravenous Feeding
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, July 1, 1982; 6(4): 295 - 300.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JPEN J Parenter Enteral NutrHome page
R. J. Elkort, F. L. Baker, J. J. Vitale, and A. Cordano
Long-Term Nutritional Support as an Adjunct to Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, September 1, 1981; 5(5): 385 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1979 by American Society for Nutrition