Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 109 No. 3 March 1979, pp. 501-507
Copyright © 1979 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hill, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hill, C. H.

The Effect of Dietary Protein Levels on Mineral Toxicity in Chicks1,2,

C. H. Hill

Department of Poultry Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27650

Studies have been conducted to determine the influence of dietary protein levels of 10, 20, and 30% fed as soybean meal on the toxicity of selenium, cadmium, vanadium, cobalt, and nickel to chicks. The toxicity was evaluated in terms of growth retardation and a decrease in resistance to S. gallinarum infection as measured by mortality. The toxicity of selenium or cadmium was unaffected by the protein level of the diet while the toxicity of vanadium, cobalt and nickel was decreased by increased dietary protein as measured by the interactions on growth. The interactions apparent on growth were not as apparent on resistance to infection indicating that the latter parameter is much less sensitive to these detary manipulations than is growth.


KEY WORDS: • selenium • cadmium • vanadium • cobalt • nickel • disease resistance • protein

1 Paper No. 5567 of the Journal Series of the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station, Raleigh, N.C. 27650.

2 The use of trade names in this publication does not imply endorsement by the North Carolina Agricultural Experiment Station of the products named, nor criticiam of similar ones not mentioned.

Manuscript received 17 March 1978.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]