Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 109 No. 12 December 1979, pp. 2098-2105
Copyright © 1979 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ohara, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yugari, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ohara, I.
Right arrow Articles by Yugari, Y.

The Influence of Carrier of Gustatory Stimulation on the Cephalic Phase of Canine Pancreatic Secretion

Ikuo Ohara, Shin-Ichiro Otsuka and Yasumi Yugari

Life Sciences Laboratories, Central Research Laboratories, Ajinomoto Co., Inc., 214, Maeda-cho, Totsuka-ku, Yokohama 244, Japan

The pancreatic secretory responses of dogs to various taste stimuli were examined in this study. Additionally, taste preferences were examined in 24-hour exposure tests to taste stimulus solutions as well as in short exposure tests to taste solutions mixed with commercial stock diet. The liquid and solid food preference tests produced quite different results. In dogs with cannulated gastric and duodenal fistulas, gustatory receptors were stimulated orally with 100 ml of taste stimulus solution (water, 0.05 M monosodium glutamate (MSG), 0.05 M citric acid or 0.3 M sucrose) mixed with 25 g of a carrier (commercial stock diet, purified diet or cellulose). Pancreatic secretory responses to the taste stimuli varied with the type of carrier. Stock diet carrier was a better stimulant than the purified diet for both protein output and volume flow. Taste stimuli with a cellulose carrier did not produce any pancreatic response at all. The differences in responses to the different carriers were gretear than the differences between taste stimuli when the same carrier was used. This experiment indicates that gustatory stimulation does influence the function of pancreatic secretion depending on the carriers used.


KEY WORDS: • oral stimulation • sugar • citric acid • glutamates • pancreatic secretion • preference • dog

Manuscript received 4 January 1979.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R. A. Samra and G H. Anderson
Insoluble cereal fiber reduces appetite and short-term food intake and glycemic response to food consumed 75 min later by healthy men
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 972 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
H. Uneyama, A. Niijima, A. San Gabriel, and K. Torii
Luminal amino acid sensing in the rat gastric mucosa
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, December 1, 2006; 291(6): G1163 - G1170.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]