QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hunt, R. D. Articles by Walsh, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hunt, R. D. Articles by Walsh, R. J.

A Comparison of the Toxicity of Ergocalciferol and Cholecalciferol in Rhesus Monkeys (Macaca mulatta)¹

New England Regional Primate Research Center, Harvard Medical School, Southborough, Massachusetts 01772

Daily oral doses of 50,000, 100,000 and 200,000 IU of ergocalciferol and cholecalciferol in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) demonstrated that cholecalciferol was significantly more toxic than ergocalciferol in this species. All animals given cholecalciferol developed hypercalcemia, died and had extensive soft tissue mineralization. Hypercalcemia occurred in ergocalciferol-supplemented monkeys, but the animals survived and comparable soft tissue mineralization was not evident after sacrifice. A unique feature of the lesion of cholecalciferol toxicity was the deposition of crystals resembling urates with an associated granulomatous reaction. A relationship to relative vitamin A deficiency was suggested.

KEY WORDS: • ergocalciferol • cholecalciferol • vitamin D

¹ Supported by National Institutes of Health, USPHS Grant no. RR 00169-10.

Manuscript received 4 February 1972.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. M. Cohen, A. M. Saulenas, C. R. Sullivan, and D. M. Albert Further Studies of the Effect of Vitamin D on Retinoblastoma: Inhibition With 1,25-Dihydroxycholecalciferol Arch Ophthalmol, April 1, 1988; 106(4): 541 - 543. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. Gilka, A. H. Corner, E. A. Sugden, and D. W. Friend Heterotopic Calcification in Swine Veterinary Pathology, March 1, 1978; 15(2): 213 - 222. [Abstract] [PDF]