Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 102 No. 1 January 1972, pp. 53-60
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mgbodile, M. U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mgbodile, M. U. K.
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, T. C.

Effect of Protein Deprivation of Male Weanling Rats on the Kinetics of Hepatic Microsomal Enzyme Activity1,2,

Marcel U. K. Mgbodile3 and T. Colin Campbell

Department of Biochemistry and Nutrition, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061

The effect of protein deficiency in male weanling rats on the activity of the hepatic microsomal enzyme system was studied. Animals were divided into three groups and were fed for 15 days either a semipurified diet containing 5% casein (group 1), 20% casein pair-fed to the 5% casein group (group 2) or 20% casein fed ad libitum (group 3). The liver weight, as a percentage of body weight, was higher in group 1. For group 1 animals, microsomal protein and DNA, when expressed per gram of liver, were approximately one-half the contents of groups 2 and 3. Maximal velocities for ethylmorphine (EM) and aniline (AN) were lower in group 1, whether these rates are expressed per milligram microsomal protein, per gram liver or per 100 g body weight. A comparison of these methods of expression suggested that the diminution of enzyme velocities for the low protein group is related both to a lower DNA content per gram tissue and to a loss of specific enzymic activity per milligram microsomal protein. The Km for ethylmorphine was lower and that for aniline was higher in group 1 animals. Restriction of food intake affected enzyme kinetic parameters similar to protein deficiency but to a significantly lesser degree. Alternative explanations for this effect of protein deficiency are discussed and an involvement of phospholipid is suggested.


KEY WORDS: • microsomal enzymes kinetics • protein deficiency • ethylmorphine • aniline

1 Supported in part by Public Health Service Research Grant no. 1 R01 ES0036 from the National Institutes of Health, Division of Environmental Sciences.

2 Presented in part at American Society of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics Meetings, Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, Chicago, Illinois, April, 1971; Federation Proc. 40: 440 (abstr.).

3 This paper represents portions of a thesis to be submitted toward partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. degree by Marcel U. K. Mgbodile.

Manuscript received 26 July 1971.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T C. Campbell
Dietary protein, growth factors, and cancer
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2007; 85(6): 1667 - 1667.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
Chhinder Pal Sodhi, S. Rana, S. Mehta, K. Vaiphei, Ramesh Chand Goel, and Satish Kumar Mehta
Study of oxidative-stress in rifampicin-induced hepatic injury in growin rats with and without protein-energy malnutrition
Human and Experimental Toxicology, June 1, 1997; 16(6): 315 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Exp ToxicolHome page
S. Rana, C. Pal Sodhi, S. Mehta, K. Vaiphei, R. Katyal, S. Thakur, and Satish Kumar Mehta
Protein-energy malnutrition and oxidative injury in growing rats
Human and Experimental Toxicology, October 1, 1996; 15(10): 810 - 814.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]