Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 101 No. 7 July 1971, pp. 855-862
Copyright © 1971 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keshavarz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keshavarz, K.
Right arrow Articles by Fuller, H. L.

Relationship of Arginine and Methionine to Creatine Formation in Chicks1

Kavous Keshavarz2 and H. L. Fuller

Poultry Science Department, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30601

Addition of 2% arginine·HCl to a corn-soybean meal diet decreased the growth rate of chicks and increased muscle creatine, creatine excretion and fat concentration in the liver. A combination of arginine and glycine was more effective than arginine alone in decreasing growth and increasing creatine excretion. Glycocyamine in a quantity equimolar to 2% arginine·HCl was shown to be the most effective metabolite among those which were studied in reducing growth and increasing creatine excretion. Supplemental methionine at 0.2% was completely effective in alleviating the growth retardation of supplemental arginine, or arginine plus glycine; however, it was only partially effective in compensating the adverse growth effect of glycocyamine. Choline, betaine, creatine and combination of folic acid plus vitamin B12 were shown to be similar to methionine in alleviating the adverse growth effect of supplemental arginine, while cystine was ineffective. Ornithine and urea fed singly or together did not have any adverse effect on growth. These results together with observations from previous experiments suggested that the adverse growth effect of excess arginine is due to increasing demand for methyl groups for formation of creatine which in turn leads to a deficiency of methionine, choline, folic acid or vitamin B12 or some combination of these.


1 University of Georgia, College of Agriculture Experiment Stations, Journal Series Paper no. 937, College Station, Athens.

2 Present address: College of Agriculture, Pahlavi University, Shiraz, Iran.

Manuscript received 23 December 1970.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
R. O. Ball, K. L. Urschel, and P. B. Pencharz
Nutritional Consequences of Interspecies Differences in Arginine and Lysine Metabolism
J. Nutr., June 1, 2007; 137(6): 1626S - 1641S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]