Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 101 No. 4 April 1971, pp. 437-444
Copyright © 1971 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Terrell, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Regen, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Terrell, E. B.
Right arrow Articles by Regen, D. M.

Effects of Simple Diets on Cholesterol Synthesis in Rat Liver1

Ernest B. Terrell2 and David M. Regen3

Department of Physiology, Vanderbilt University Medical School, Nashville, Tennessee 37203

Judging from the incorporation of 2-14C-acetate into cholesterol by perfused rat livers, the relative rates of hepatic cholesterol synthesis under several conditions were as follows: 1) fed laboratory ration throughout, 100; 2) fasting 1 day, 19; 3) fasting with bile fistula 1 day, 81; 4) fasting 2 days, 11; 5) fed a calorie-free diet (cellulose) 2 days, 9; 6) fed the calorie-free diet with 3% cholestyramine 2 days, 174; 7) fed corn oil at 1 kcal/g (in cellulose) 2 days, 17; 8) fed sucrose and starch at 0.25 and 0.75 kcal/g (in cellulose) 2 days, 43; 9) fed casein, bovine serum albumin, and sodium glutamate at about 0.48, 0.47 and 0.06 kcal/g, respectively, 2 days, 55. It is seen that enhanced removal of secreted bile steroids from the enterohepatic circulation (3 vs. 2, 6 vs. 5) is a potent stimulus to cholesterol synthesis. However, 1 day of bile drainage was no greater stimulus than continued laboratory ration feeding (3 vs. 1), suggesting that factors other than escape of bile steroids from the enterohepatic circulation can influence steroid turnover. The flow of bulk through the intestines did not stimulate synthesis (5 vs. 4) showing that mechanical events associated with feeding are not entirely responsible for the effects of the laboratory diet; i.e., chemical properties of the diet are essential to the feeding effect (1 vs. 2 or 4). Dietary carbohydrate and protein both seem to contribute to the stimulatory effect of a laboratory diet (8 and 9 vs. 5). The role of fat in this respect appears to be very different from the other two nutrients (7 vs. 8 and 9).


1 Supported by U.S. Public Health Service Grant AM-09875.

2 E.B.T. has submitted this work to Tennessee State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for a Master of Science degree.

3 D.M.R. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

Manuscript received 27 August 1970.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]