Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 101 No. 2 February 1971, pp. 265-272
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sullivan, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Hamilton, J. G.

Factors Influencing the in vivo and in vitro Rates of Lipogenesis in Rat Liver

Ann C. Sullivan, O. Neal Miller, James S. Wittman, III and James G. Hamilton

Department of Biochemical Nutrition, Hoffmann-La Roche Inc., Nutley, New Jersey 07110

In vivo and in vitro rates of lipogenesis were studied in rat liver. Several factors were established as important for the production of reproducibly consistent and maximal rates of lipogenesis in vivo: 1) a 48-hour prefast, 2) a single 3-hour meal-feeding daily, 3) a diet high in monosaccharides or disaccharides, 4) a body weight of 120 to 160 g. The rate of lipogenesis was found to be inversely related to body weight. Under the described conditions, the maximal rate was reached 5 to 9 days after institution of meal-feeding. Subsequently, the rate dropped to approximately one-half maximum and this level was maintained for at least 34 days. The kinetics of in vivo and in vitro lipogenesis were studied on day 7 of meal-feeding. Lipogenesis reached a maximum 5 hours after meal initiation and a minimum at 24 hours, when the in vivo rate had declined to 3% of the 5-hour level while the in vitro rate had declined to only 18 to 25% of this value. The ratio of the in vivo to the in vitro rate was a relative index used to compare the lipogenic capacity 5 and 24 hours after feeding. Five hours after feeding, the in vivo rate of lipogenesis was maximal, but apparently only 55 to 59% of the available lipogenic enzyme pool, as determined by the in vitro rate, was required to produce this rate. Twenty-four hours after feeding, only 7 to 8% of the lipogenic enzyme pool was used to produce the in vivo rate, the in vitro rate of lipogenesis being 13 to 15 times the observed in vivo rate. This suggests that in addition to lipogenic enzyme activities other regulators are functioning in the control of lipogenesis.


Manuscript received 22 July 1970.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]