Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 101 No. 10 October 1971, pp. 1367-1372
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shenk, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shenk, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Thomas, J. W.

Meadow Vole Nutrition Studies with Alfalfa Diets1

J. S. Shenk2, F. C. Elliott and J. W. Thomas

Departments of Crop and Soil Science and Dairy Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48823

A technique for feeding alfalfa forage to weanling meadow voles was improved by the addition of 2% cellulose gum in the formulation of the diet. Diet wastage was reduced allowing more precise intake measurements. Responses of weanlings to various percentages of alfalfa in the diet were compared to predicted responses from equations developed with semisynthetic diets. Major deviations between actual and predicted daily gains occurred at high percentages of alfalfa in the diet (73 to 93%), but followed more closely those predicted when diets were fed with less than 68% alfalfa. Voles digested 10 to 30% of the alfalfa fiber with a positive relationship to the percentage fed. Weanlings fed alfalfa forage from clones selected for high nutritive value at 48 and 83% of the diet had greater weight gain and lower fiber digestibility when compared to forages from clones selected for low nutritive value.


1 Published with the approval of the Director of the Agricultural Experiment Station as Journal Article no. 5323.

2 Present address: Agronomy Department, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

Manuscript received 12 January 1971.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]