Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 100 No. 8 August 1970, pp. 873-882
Copyright © 1970 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Valle-Riestra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, R. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Valle-Riestra, J.
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, R. H.

Digestion of Heat-damaged Egg Albumen1 by the Rat,2

José Valle-Riestra3 and Richard H. Barnes

Graduate School of Nutrition, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850

The influence of heat treatment of egg-white protein in the presence or absence of glucose on the intestinal digestion and absorption of the protein in rats has been studied. Lysine-labeled egg albumen was produced by injecting laying hens with 14C-L-lysine·HCl. The radioactive egg white was dialyzed to remove traces of glucose, lyophilized and autoclaved at 120° for 60 minutes, either in the presence or absence of glucose to obtain a Maillard reaction protein and a heat-damaged carbohydrate-free protein, respectively. The two heat-treated proteins were fed to weanling male rats which were killed at different time intervals to recover the contents of different segments of the gastrointestinal tract. The distributions of radioactivity and nitrogen were determined both in the total and the trichloroacetic acid-soluble fractions. Rats fed with the Maillard egg albumen excreted three times more radio-activity in the urine than those fed with glucose-free ovalbumen, whereas the 14CO2 recovery in the expired air was three times higher in the latter. This is possibly due to the absorption of an epsilon-N-lysine compound produced through the Maillard reaction which cannot be utilized and is therefore excreted in the urine. In one experiment where conventional rats and rats treated with an antibiotic diet (2% phthalylsulfathiazole plus 0.1% penicillin) were fed the above protein, a significantly (P < 0.05) greater recovery of radioactivity was obtained from the antibiotic-treated animals. This is possibly due to a greater bacterial proteolysis in the conventional rat and contributes support for the concept that the intestinal microflora may increase the apparent digestibility of heat-damaged proteins. The percentage recovery of lysine radioactivity in the gut 16 hours post cibum (found mainly in the cecum and large intestine) and the total radioactivity recovered in the feces 72 hours after feeding were exactly the same, indicating that under the conditions of this experiment there was no detectable absorption of lysine or its degradation products from the undigestible residue in the cecum and colon. A digestibility trial with conventional and coprophagy-prevented rats, using autoclaved ovalbumen and Maillard protein, indicated that under the vigorous heat treatment to which these proteins were subjected, lysine was prevented from absorption to the same degree as the rest of the protein. Coprophagy prevention reduced the digestibility of Maillard protein to a greater extent than that of the "glucose-free egg albumen."


1 As used in this paper, albumen and ovalbumen are synonymous with egg white.

2 Supported in part by funds provided through the State University of New York and a research grant from the National Science Foundation.

3 Present address: Universidad Agraria, Apartado 456, La Molina, Lima, Peru; Rockefeller Foundation fellow during tenure at Cornell University.

Manuscript received 20 June 1969.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]